SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (50443)2/22/2002 1:06:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 54805
 
Redmond's Mobile Push

By Ari Weinberg
Forbes.com
Friday February 22, 8:00 am Eastern Time

When Microsoft wants to get into a market, the Redmond, Wash.-based company creeps up slowly and then stomps. It did it to Lotus and WordPerfect. It overcame Netscape. Currently it's taking on Palm , plus Sony and Nintendo , all at once.

Now Microsoft is gunning for the burgeoning market for "smart handhelds," a catchall phrase that describes handheld computers that in various combinations can send and receive email, browse the Web and make wireless phone calls. Microsoft is aiming for a day when Windows runs on mobile phones as widely as it does the PC.

By announcing chip design deals with Intel and Texas Instruments for their so-called Smartphone, Microsoft is trying to create a standard upon which manufacturers can build PocketPC and Smartphone devices. That's a direct attack on the major players in the mobile phone industry, namely Motorola , Ericsson and Nokia .

Microsoft is making no secret who it's aiming at. "Nokia has the most to be concerned about," says Microsoft's vice president of mobility, Juha Christensen. He says that while Nokia leads in handset design and market share, it's looking at slowing sales growth that could cut into the Finnish company's cushy 17% operating margin (2001).

Microsoft's assault on the wireless business comes as its main business of licensing Windows and selling PC software is suffering from sputtering PC sales. Retail desktop sales in the United States fell 25% in 2001 to $4.9 billion, according to market research firm NPDTechworld. Microsoft's targets--personal digital assistants (PDAs) and cell phones--are still growing. U.S. retail PDA sales were up 19% to $950 million in 2001. U.S. cell phone unit sales were up 7% to 21.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2001.

So as Microsoft makes its opening moves by attacking Nokia's front line of popular phones, Nokia has countered by making moves on its back end. Yesterday it announced that it wants to collaborate with other companies on IP base station architecture--essentially the technology behind getting voice and data from networks to phones.

Nokia "We fear no competition as long as they adhere to open standards," counters Nokia spokesperson Pekka Isosommpi.

The fight of course, will be right in the middle, or right where the wireless service providers sit.

While Nokia can make a cute phone, it takes service providers like NTT Docomo in Japan, Vodafone in the U.K. and VoiceStream Wireless in the U.S. to sell them. With a 37% share of the global handset market, Nokia has ironclad relationships with scores of service providers around the world, and none will shift their loyalties lightly.

With major phone manufacturers sticking to their own software, Microsoft has sidestepped companies like Nokia and Ericsson by heading right to carriers with products made by Hewlett-Packard and Taiwan's Compal .

The phone makers don't intend to sit still developing their own software to compete with Microsoft's. Nokia, Motorola and Ericsson are only three companies behind the Symbian consortium, which continues to develop Symbian OS, the same operating system used on the Psion line of handheld computers popular in Europe. Nokia will launch a Symbian-based phone in the U.S. later this year, while Microsoft's products are already showing up in Europe.

But management fallout and sluggish action could have Symbian racing to catch up. Christensen, a co-founder of Symbian, joined Microsoft more than a year ago. Before Symbian, he spent six years at Psion.

As for Microsoft's other goal, to sell PocketPC/Smartphones, the lead in phone/PDA integration belongs to Palm . And while Pocket PC use is growing, Palm's operating system was on nearly 60% of PDAs shipped worldwide in 2001, according to Dataquest.

Michael Mace, chief competitive officer for PalmSource in Santa Clara, Calif., Palm's soon-to-be separate software unit, points to success of current Samsung and Kyocera Palm phones, along with software licensing by Handspring and Sony , to demonstrate the strength of the Palm OS--a much simpler and less power-consuming PDA platform.

"There is not a single perfect design," says Mace. "Mobile devices are more like clothing. You don't see anyone out there trying to develop one suit for everyone."

While Microsoft's Christensen says the buzz from 3GSM World--an industry conference going on in France--is that people want smart voice/data capable devices, it looks to be the consumer, not industry big wigs, that could make the ultimate call.

"Cell phones are still a minimalist environment for consumers," says Rob Sanderson, an analyst at Bank of America Securities.

However, Microsoft's marketing muscle and power of persuasion, with Intel and Texas Instruments at its back, looks like it could change the landscape.



To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (50443)2/22/2002 7:51:24 PM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Andrew,

Wonder why this is so?

I wonder if it is explained by the two companies' free cash flow. I haven't made that comparison, so I don't know.

--Mike Buckley



To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (50443)2/22/2002 11:41:35 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Since we're already in 2002, why are you using 2000 numbers to compare two companies? Investors are currently pricing the stocks based on trailing 12-month (and guesses of forward 12-month) performance. Some are basing their stock valuations on 2003 expectations, throwing out 2002 and 2001 as trough years. 2000 is ancient history. Even more important, 2000 and 1999 are anomalous history, like 1927 and 1928. Not likely we'll see years like that again, for a loooooooooonnnnnnng time.

In calendar year 2001, QCOM reported earnings of -0.04$/share. Notice the negative sign. That's the summation of the good parts of the business (licenses and chips), and the bad parts of the business (Strategic Misadventures). The Strategic Misadventure Division, is a core part of their business plan, and the pattern of losses has been the opposite of "one-time".

Further, since the telecom services companies are retrenching, cutting capex budgets, seeing their credit ratings cut, having increasing problems refinancing their debts, and cannot possibly fund the 3G buildout out of their cash flows, you are not going to see 75% EPS growth rates for QCOM, not in 2002, or 2003. Maybe 2004. But that's so far in the future, investor's will pay nothing for it today.

At a price below 40, IMO, investors are seeing no wireless data tornado in QCOM's future. Or seeing it so far away, in an uncertain future, that it is over the (investing) horizon. Which presents opportunity, for those who think there is such a future for QCOM.

My next buy point is at 30. Then I unload the lots I bought at 40 and 35, the next time investors get (briefly) hopeful.