Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (114053)	2/22/2002 3:14:53 PM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

John: If you subtract liabilities from assets, you get zero. If you recall, assets = liabilities. 1-1 = 0, not $350 million.

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (114053)	2/22/2002 3:37:56 PM
From: arun gera	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>I am merely observing that the theory of untold riches just over the horizon has been with us for at least three years now without any measurable results. Except that the horizon remains in front of us like a carrot on a stick.> Three years is long term horizon? Core technology takes a decade to develop into a commercial success. 10 years of sunk costs. We all waited for three years, between 1996 and 1999, when the stock barely budged. Then suddenly the profits jumped 4-5 times. You sow and then you reap. OK. The stock went up 40 times, which was a big bubble. The stock is more reasonable now. And if you are saying it should be 24 instead of 32, 20 percent up or down is just noise in tech stocks.