Obviously, 'haqiana' <snicker> you are too stupid to open...
... a link, as Ray said nothing in his post on the Foreign Affairs thread about Molly Ivins being stupid.
I would suggest you go there, again.
If you know how.
Oh, hell, I'll just cut-'n-paste it assuming otherwise.
Thank you, Ray! -- again, I find it unfortunate that the Austin American-Statesman doesn't carry the column, as the Forth Worth Star-Telegram is not widely available in Austin. The Houston Chronicle, NYT, WSJ are. By 'widely available,' I mean in retail-level distribution i.e. convenience store racks/in-store.
Here you are, 'enema:' [Edit: Oops! Did I make a typo? Oh, well. Sh*t, obviously, 'happens.']
A bad idea and some better ones Star-Telegram Molly Ivins
AUSTIN - One rarely sees a thoroughly bad idea advanced by government. [[Ed.: No wonder Hitchens
considers Kissinger and his ilk to be Stalinists!]]
Lots of stuff from silly to smelly gets done, but somebody usually benefits, even if it's not the American people. But
can anyone see an upside to having an office of government propaganda with an official license to lie?
(uncle, you there?)
They say if you fight someone long enough, you become like your enemy, but this Soviet notion is such a bummer
that it was useless even to them back in the day. But the Bush administration is apparently determined to bring us
not one but two bureaus of propaganda.
The "Office of Strategic Influence" - isn't that a beauty? - at the Pentagon will use "the media, the Internet and
a range of covert operations to try to influence public opinion and government policy abroad, including in friendly
nations," according to The New York Times. "Strategic Influence" will include both information and disinformation.
Disinformation, in case you haven't figured it out, is made of lies.
Then on top of that gem, the Bush administration also proposes "a permanent office of global diplomacy to
spread a positive image [[Ed.: Chances of success? Is this the OFFICE OF STRATEGIC IDIOCY? of
the United States around the world and combat anti-Americanism." This would include "intense shaping of
information and coordination of messages" to ensure that "foreign correspondents in Washington as well as foreign
leaders and opinion-makers overseas understand Mr. Bush's ideas and policies."
Let me go not very far out on a limb to predict this will be a disaster. It will wreck our credibility in no time.
Sheesh, when will they ever learn?
There are several documented cases of "blowback" from the Cold War, when we spread some lie and it
came back to bite us in the rear. As any journalist can tell you, when you put out misinformation, all it does is
poison the well of public debate.
The Bushies are great believers in "message discipline" - they practiced it endlessly during the 2000 campaign. Oh,
but facts are troublesome things. Not even giant public relations campaigns can make them go away.
Did you sign up anywhere to have your tax dollars used for government propaganda? Do you like the idea? Let's
kill this before it multiplies.
If Bush wants to do something about anti-Americanism abroad, he could:
- Get onboard the Kyoto Protocol on global warming and help save the world.
- Stop our blind support of Israel in its conflict with the Palestinians and get serious about forcing a settlement in the
face of that yawning disaster. We are more pro-Israeli than the Israelis, who have a humongous public debate
about their own policies, which rather clearly aren't working.
We could quit doing dumb stuff like:
- Outraging world opinion by saying we won't treat the prisoners at Gitmo as POWs under the Geneva
Conventions.
- Appointing John Negroponte, a major figure in the Iran-contra mess, as ambassador to the United Nations.
- Appointing Otto Reich, another high-level Iran-contra figure, as assistant secretary of state for inter-American
affairs.
- Adding to the global warming problem by rescinding rules for improving energy efficiency in air conditioners and
heaters, dropping Bush's campaign promise to regulate carbon dioxide and canceling the 2004 deadline for
automakers to develop prototype high-mileage cars.
- Pushing for development of small nuclear weapons in violation of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
- Banning federal aid to international family planning programs that offer abortion counseling with separate,
independent funding.
- Appointing John Bolton, who opposes nonproliferation treaties and the United Nations, to undersecretary of state
for arms control and international security.
- Continuing our own production of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons while lecturing the rest of the world
for doing the same thing, including naming Iran, Iraq and North Korea an "axis of evil" for doing exactly what we
do. What does that make us? [[Ed.: Why, ummm, uhh, stammmer, oh, HYPOCRITES? ]]
- Screwing up our ally South Korea's long-held plans to make some accommodation with the North.
We can all think of several other things that America could do to improve the opinion the world holds of us - but
running a propaganda campaign is not among them. Isn't it bad enough that we lead the world in contributing to air
pollution - do we have to pollute the truth, too?
dfw.com |
