Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (230528)	2/25/2002 12:33:56 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

>>"Yes, there is much dissatisfaction. Do you think civil war would be better? The advent of an Islamicist regime? The conquest of the Arabian peninsula by either Iraq or Iran? We deal with situations as we find them....."<< Can't resist this one....You are on to something.....Saudi Civil War followed by invasions by Iran/Iraq followed by "We deal with situations as we find them..." and you, Wolfowitz, Kristol, Pearl...etc., get your dream. The Middle East becomes the 51st state! I like it. Write an article for the "Standard" to get it started.

To: Neocon who wrote (230528)	2/25/2002 4:10:31 PM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

It's complicated and I have no answers. But this "axis of evil" thing is pointed at three countries that are hardly an axis. Not like the Nazi, Italian and Japanese axis in the 40s. North Korea is making peaceful overtures to the south. Iranian moderates are gaining a voice. Iraq, I agree, is "evil" if you want to call it that. None of those countries played as significant a role in 911 as the Saudis, yet they are not included in the evil axis. I guess because they're an important player in the oil axis.