Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Artie who wrote (323)	2/27/2002 10:53:04 PM
From: Letmebe Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 613

Hello Artie. You are a real asset here! I looked up the paragraph...Pg 3.... [They hope] to get a bulk sample of 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes by poking 10 kilometers of 6" RC diameter holes into FT to delineate resource calculation. I imagine if they knew they were drilling through kimberlite, they would be able to figure out the weight more exactly. The syntax issue bugs me. There are several examples where sentence structure & word choice was less than I expect in an annual report. Re: TWG's land at Jackson Inlet appears to have potential for an economic diamond deposit. The company is currently capped at $40 million - a favorable milestone on John Kaiser's "Diamond Exploration Cycle". This is not reflected in the market price of its shares - another part of the enigma by any definition. I feel IMHO that TWG has as much, if not better a chance at an economic resource, than the whole overtouted Otish play. Interesting trading activity happening. I've got a stink bid in, but I missed the market order that dropped TWG to .45 - too late. Take care. And it's sure nice to see the sun later in the day.