SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jttmab who wrote (3054)2/28/2002 11:24:56 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Last I heard W said he wouldn't do anything about the Afghans growing poppies for opium.
If most of that opium makes its way to Europe, I suppose that is why he isn't interested
in the destruction of this year's poppy crop.

You are right. The War Lords will end up with the money, the arms and the power.
For the past 150 years or so Afghanistan has not been a stable country, my husband tells me.
Is the situation likely to change soon?



To: jttmab who wrote (3054)2/28/2002 11:25:43 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Asia arms race feared as US to sell technology to India

By Colin Nickerson, Globe Staff, 2/26/2002

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - The looming sale of sophisticated
military radars by the United States to India is stirring
fears of a new arms race in South Asia, a powder keg region
where one war is winding down in Afghanistan while a
potentially much more devastating conflict threatens to
explode on the India-Pakistan border.


The deal, if it goes through, would mark the first major transfer
of military technology from the United States to India and is
meant to solidify an emerging strategic alliance between the
two countries. But the timing is touching off alarm bells.

In recent months, India and arch-foe Pakistan, both possessing
nuclear arsenals, have massed hundreds of thousands of
troops along a tense border stretching from the high
Himalayas to the Arabian Sea, each side readying for a
possible military showdown over the disputed territory of
Kashmir.

Pakistan's military government, which after the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks on the United States reversed its previous
policy of supporting Muslim radicals in the region to join the
American-led war on terror, was stunned last week when the
chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard B.
Myers, announced in New Delhi that the sale of advanced ''Fire
Finder'' radar systems is being negotiated with India.

''The US-India military relationship is central to maintaining
long-term stability in Asia,'' Myers said in a statement. ''This
agreement will be for the Indian Army the first major
government-to-government purchase of military equipment
from the United States.''

In response to the deal, Pakistan avoided direct criticism of the
United States, but made no secret of its fear and fury.

''This does not augur well for peace in the region,'' said Foreign
Ministry spokesman Aziz Khan, warning that India's
''relentless pursuit'' of new weapons technology threatens to
spur a dangerous arms race like the one that led the bitter
rivals to build nuclear warheads in the late 1990s.

Pakistan is the only significant Muslim nation that has
unequivocally supported America's military campaign in
Afghanistan, an extraordinary gamble for leader Pervez
Musharraf given the antipathy of most Pakistanis - and,
indeed, most Muslims - toward the United States and its war
against Islamic extremists.

The United States desperately wants to keep Pakistan on its
side. But, in the long term, American policy in South Asia is
primarily focused on forging better ties with India, the region's
economic and military giant.

In purely military terms, sale of the radar system signifies
little.

Built by Raytheon, the AN/TPQ-37 Fire Finder radar system
locates enemy rocket and artillery positions by tracking the
trajectory of incoming shells or missiles and, in split-seconds,
computing target data for counter-battery fire.

But Pakistanis have interpreted the sale of the radar as a
symbolic slap against their nation. The deal dominated front
pages and editorial columns last week.

''This sends a critical signal to Pakistan in terms of US
interests in the region,'' Shireen M. Mazari, a Pakistani
defense analyst and director of Islamabad's Institute of
Strategic Studies.

''It's a big mistake on the part of the US. The timing is terrible.
Musharraf has staked his leadership on the idea of long-term
alignment with the US. And here come the Americans selling
new weapons and upsetting the arms balance.''

''At some point,'' she said, ''there will be a new arms race.
Maybe that is all the Americans want, to make a profit by the
tensions in our region.''

There's nothing new about the rancor between India and
Pakistan. The adversaries have fought three full-blown wars
since Muslim Pakistan was partitioned from Hindu-dominated
India at the end of British colonial rule in 1947. And what
passes for peace between the two sides would be called war
almost anywhere else: Along the heavily militarized ''Line of
Control'' dividing Kashmir, artillery duels and fierce exchanges
of mortar rounds and small arms fire are almost daily
occurences.

But a deadly Dec. 13 attack by Muslim radicals on India's
Parliament has pushed the danger level into the upper reaches
of the red zone.

India promptly accused Pakistan of being behind the plot, a
charge vehemently denied by Islamabad.

Most analysts doubt that Pakistan played any role in the
rampage, which left 14 dead, including the five suicide
attackers. But Pakistan has encouraged and armed Kashmir
''freedom fighters'' for years, subsidizing an insurgency that
has killed tens of thousands of civilians.

Nonetheless, under pressure from the United States, Pakistan
has cracked down hard on Kashmir rebels operating from its
soil, a politically risky move for Musharraf given the degree of
popular support for the Kashmir cause.

The United States imposed sanctions - including a ban on all
military sales - on India and Pakistan after they tested nuclear
weapons in 1999. But since the attacks on the Pentagon and
World Trade Center, Washington has been courting both
countries as allies in the campaign against terror.

It was probably mediation by the United States that prevented
Pakistan and India from going to war in December, but the
countries remain on the brink of war, each making pugnacious
shows of force with battle tank maneuvers, massing an
estimated 800,000 combat troops along the border, and
mounting military ''excercises'' that are plainly more
provocation than training.

This story ran on page A22 of the Boston Globe on 2/26/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version | Search archives ]



To: jttmab who wrote (3054)3/1/2002 12:49:44 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
U.S. Faults 3 Nations on Anti-Drug Efforts
The New York Times

"Mr. Bush decided NOT to impose
penalties on Afghanistan, where 4,000
American troops are stationed, or
Haiti, the Western Hemisphere's
poorest nation. He said it was in the vital interest of the
United States to support those nations."


February 26, 2002

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

W ASHINGTON, Feb. 25 -
President Bush has determined
that Afghanistan, Haiti and Myanmar
"failed demonstrably" in the fight
against drugs over the last year,
officials said today.

But Mr. Bush decided not to impose
penalties on Afghanistan, where 4,000
American troops are stationed, or
Haiti, the Western Hemisphere's
poorest nation. He said it was in the vital interest of the United States to support
those nations. Myanmar remained ineligible for most forms of United States aid.

The findings are the first under a new procedure that allows the administration to
deliver an annual report card on only those countries it says are the most
egregious cases of noncooperation.

For years, nations like Mexico and Colombia objected to the annual process known
as certification, which they viewed as humiliating and one- sided. Before the
change, the State Department provided detailed assessments of about two dozen
countries linked to drugs.

During a visit to Washington last year, President Vicente Fox of Mexico made a plea
for lawmakers to abandon the certification review. Rand Beers, the State
Department's top anti-narcotics official, said the United States was studying ways
to persuade opium farmers in Afghanistan to plow under their crops.

The United States is already blocking more than $200
million in loans to Haiti to prod President Jean-Bertrand
Aristide to reach an accommodation with his political foes.

nytimes.com



To: jttmab who wrote (3054)3/1/2002 12:52:41 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 

Study: Afghans Growing Opium Poppy


February 28, 2002

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 6:44 p.m. ET

VIENNA, Austria (AP) -- The
opium poppy harvest in
Afghanistan this year is likely to
return to levels seen before the
ousted Taliban banned the crop,
the United Nations reported
Thursday.


The Taliban, driven from power by the U.S.-led war against
terrorism, banned poppy production in July 2000.
Officials said that last year, farmers in Taliban-controlled
territory reaped only 200 tons of poppy, from which both
opium and heroin are derived. That was down from 3,300
tons the year before.


The crop was sown in November in formerly
Taliban-controlled regions in the south and west of the
country. The Taliban grip on power was nearly
non-existent then under the pressure of U.S. bombing.
Farmers went back to their traditional ways and the U.N.
report forecasts a harvest of 1,900 and 2,700 tons this
year.

By early February, observers from the U.N. International
Drug Control Program saw small green poppy plants
breaking through the soil in areas that accounted for 84
percent of the total cultivation in 2000.

Northern Afghanistan was excluded from the survey
because the colder climate there usually delays planting.

Many poor Afghan farmers cannot resist planting poppy
because of the profit to be had, said Sumru Noyan of the
UNDCP.

In Helmand province in the southwest, some farmers
plowed under germinating wheat in January to replant
with poppy, the U.N. report said. It claimed fields
associated with some villages were 70 percent under
poppy cultivation.

Steinar Bjornsson, interim head of the U.N. Office for
Drug Control and Crime Prevention, said curtailing poppy
production in Afghanistan was crucial to the recovery of
the impoverished, war-ravaged country. After
malnutrition, he said, drugs pose the most serious
challenge to future stability because they fund terrorism.

``The U.N. is trying to rebuild the country in perhaps its
most complex undertaking ever,'' he said.

The UNDCP is helping the interim Afghan government of
Prime Minister Hamid Karzai set up legal structures and
law enforcement agencies that will help authorities fight
the production of drugs.

Karzai's U.N.-brokered government announced a ban on
poppy production last month, after many fields had
already been sown.

The bulk of the heroin and opium derived from Afghan
poppy is transported by smugglers to Western Europe
through Iran, Turkey and the Balkans, Noyan said.


nytimes.com



To: jttmab who wrote (3054)3/5/2002 1:15:24 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
A Far-Right Militia's Far-Fetched Plot Draws Some Serious Attention

"The logic of their plan, if you can call it logic, was that by killing
local law enforcement people, the state of Montana would have no
choice but to send in the National Guard," Sheriff Dupont said.
"Then they hoped to wipe out the National Guard. And then they
hoped that NATO troops would be sent in and that would trigger an all-out revolution."



The New York Times



March 3, 2002



By BLAINE HARDEN

KALISPELL, Mont., March 2 - As
its secrets began to spill out here
this week, Project 7 sounded
suspiciously like a Monty Python
sketch.

A dogcatcher was on its list of 26 local
law enforcement officials who needed
killing. The chief intelligence gatherer
for the furtive far-right militia cell was a cleaning woman,
according to Sheriff
James R. Dupont of Flathead County, who himself made the hit list of Project 7.
The militia's name comes from the Montana license plate numbering system,
which uses the numeral 7 to identify residents of Flathead.

The cleaning woman, Tracy Brockway, 32, was having an affair with the leader of
Project 7 in a house bristling with 35 guns and thousands of rounds of
ammunition, the sheriff said. He identified the militia's leader as David Earl
Burgert, 38, whose last known job was renting snowmobiles, who could often be
heard carping about judges on a local right-wing radio station and who has a long
history of being annoying. At Christmas, when his neighbors lined streets with
paper bags containing lighted candles, Mr. Burgert mounted his snowmobile and
snuffed them out.

"If you picture a schoolyard bully who has a big mouth, that would be Burgert,"
said Bruce Parish, a detective in the sheriff's office.

This far northwest corner of Montana, along with the
nearby northern neck of Idaho, has for decades been
incubating right-wing militias, conspiracy theorists and
white supremacists. Many of them have demonstrated an
outsize appetite for military hardware and survival gear.

Kalispell (population 17,000) might seem an unlikely
staging ground for militias bearing grudges. It is the
county seat of Flathead County, one of the fastest-growing
communities in Montana and a pristine outdoor
destination that includes half of Glacier National Park and
more than a million acres of mountain wilderness. The
town is near the northern end of Flathead Lake, the
largest freshwater lake in the West and one of the cleanest
lakes in the world.

Yet a decades-old decline in an economy based on logging and mining, combined
with the rise of a New West culture dominated by affluent professionals and
retirees who go outside not to work but to recreate, has left many local people
confused, resentful and looking for someone to blame. Project 7 appears to have set
a new standard, both for zany scapegoating and for industrial-strength firepower.

"This is the weirdest, most violence-prone thing we have seen in Montana for a long
time," said Ken Toole, a Democratic state senator who runs the Montana Human
Rights Network, which studies right- wing movements in Montana and Idaho.
"There is a comic element to these people," Mr. Toole said. "But it washes away
pretty quickly because of the guns."


The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms are taking it all seriously.

On Friday, after a long meeting with the county sheriff and the police chief in
Kalispell, the F.B.I. took charge of the conspiracy investigation into possible links
that Mr. Burgert may have had with other right- wing groups. The A.T.F. took
charge of tracking all the weapons.

After a tip early last month from a Project 7 defector, the sheriff's department
found two trailers packed with 30,000 rounds of ammunition, a broad array of
small arms, body armor, pipe bombs, exploding booby traps, bomb-making
chemicals and a vast inventory of survivalist gear and military rations.

"I think it would have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy all that stuff
at once," Detective Parish said. "So it is very possible that it was built up over
several years."

What Project 7 was gearing up for, said the defector who tipped off the sheriff, was
a round of assassinations in early summer. The sheriff's department discovered a
list of what appeared to be targets that included local judges, the county
prosecutor, the Kalispell chief of police, members of a police swat team and the
dogcatcher.

Some of the targets worked at a police station in the nearby town of Whitefish,
where Mrs. Brockway was employed. The sheriff said she had apparently sifted
through trash baskets, gleaning information about where some officers filled their
prescriptions and how others struggled with their weight. The sheriff's department
found information sheets detailing her discoveries.

"The logic of their plan, if you can call it logic, was that by killing local law
enforcement people, the state of Montana would have no choice but to send in the
National Guard," Sheriff Dupont said. "Then they hoped to wipe out the National
Guard. And then they hoped that NATO troops would be sent in and that would
trigger an all-out revolution."


The sheriff and Detective Parish rolled their eyes incredulously as they explained
what Project 7 hoped to accomplish. They suggested that Mr. Burgert was a
blowhard who had bitten off more than he could chew.

Investigators from the sheriff's department say they have identified four or perhaps
five local people who were involved in the plot. Two of them, Mr. Burgert and Mrs.
Brockway, are in custody. Two of the others have told investigators that while they
knew about Project 7, they had no intention of killing anyone.

Sheriff Dupont learned of the plot in early February, after Mr. Burgert disappeared
for nearly a month. Mr. Burgert's wife reported him mysteriously absent on Jan. 9.
His pickup truck was found near a local river, with his fishing pole. His wife hinted
to the sheriff's department that maybe he had drowned.

The sheriff's department, though, smelled a rat. Mr. Burgert had no hook on his
fishing line and his tackle box, deputies said, was filled with lures that no
respectable Montana fisherman would ever use.

On Feb. 7, Mr. Burgert, who had become a fugitive after failing to show up for a
hearing on charges that he punched a sheriff's deputy in early 2001, was spotted
coming out of Mrs. Brockway's home.

Her husband, Alan Brockway, also a suspect in the militia plot, left Montana for
Israel several months ago. "The information we have is that he left because of the
affair between his wife and Mr. Burgert," Detective Parish said.

After Mr. Burgert was spotted, sheriff's deputies staked out the house. When he
and Mrs. Brockway drove off in a heavy snowstorm, deputies gave chase. Mr.
Burgert slid off the road, but fled into the woods, carrying a rifle. After trackers
found him and after an all-night standoff, during which Mr. Burgert held the gun
under is chin and threatened to shoot himself, he surrendered.

All this happened in early February, which was when local investigators first got
wind of Project 7 and the assassination plot. The sheriff's office kept the lid on its
investigation, as computer experts from the state police tried - and, so far, failed
- to crack encrypted information found on Mr. Burgert's home computer.

The lid came off on Tuesday, when Mrs. Brockway went to court for a bond hearing.
On the witness stand, she announced the existence of Project 7 and local reporters
began asking questions. Sheriff Dupont and other local law enforcement officials
quickly decided to reveal the inquiry.

"The real scary part of this whole deal is, what if we had not got onto Mr. Burgert?"
the sheriff asked in an interview on Friday evening in his office. "Could he have
recruited enough people to execute the plan?"

Answering his own question, the sheriff said he doubted Mr. Burgert's
conspiratorial skills. "It was always his mouth that got him in trouble," the sheriff
said.

nytimes.com