Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (33944)	2/27/2002 8:10:02 AM
From: Paul A	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

Good lord Zeev- dont look at IMCL this morning unless you held it long into this morning : ) Talk about a pop..

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (33944)	2/27/2002 8:18:09 PM
From: Psycho-Social	Respond to of 99280

Zeev re: sign of a false rally . . . Jake Bernstein's indices of trader sentiment are already entering overbought territory: S&P bullish %s: 75%/3dy mov ave, 53%/5dy mov ave. Nasdaq bullish %s: 73%/3dy, 50%/5dy.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (33944)	3/4/2002 8:41:11 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

False rally three trading days ago...... To:Larry Dudash who wrote (33863) From: Zeev Hed Wednesday, Feb 27, 2002 8:03 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37223 Larry, we are essentially 100 Naz points higher than at the low Friday, but the new highs list is still contracting, not expanding. The new lows have contracted from last week, but not by much. That is actually a sign of a false rally, by now new highs on the Naz should have been back above 100 if that rally was the "real McCoy". You can make a stronger argument about the NYSE in that respect, however. Zeev