SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 9:37:58 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
The net loss applicable to holders of common stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2001 was $9.7 million, or $0.17 per share, compared with $7.6 million, or $0.18 per share, for same period in the prior year.



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 9:39:57 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2001 were $9.8 million, compared to $9.5 million for the prior year. The net loss applicable to holders of common stock for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $32.2 million, or $0.63 per share, compared with $24.2 million, or $0.63 per share, for the prior year.



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 9:46:41 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
BURN, BABY BURN, XYBERNAUT BURN RATE DISCO INFURNO!!



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 10:16:55 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
XYBR EARNING REPORT IS A SILK PURSE!!, Roy, why doesnt XYBR just pay Donner for another one of those "Strong Buys" like they did before? Maybe that would give some pep to the stock price.

WILL DONNER END UP LIKE CHRISTINA?

Silk purse in penny stocks

A tout makes money even as his clients’ shares collapse

By Bruce Kelly
Tech stocks have been decimated by the market downturn, but Jeff
Baclet has kept the faith.
After all, he’s paid by companies that have slipped so far in value that
they’ve fallen into the
netherworld of penny stocks.
Selling for less than $5 a share, they dwell in the low-rent district of
the Nasdaq’s Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets — thinly traded, rarely followed by
analysts, little known to
investors and subject to wild bursts of volatility.
That’s where Mr. Baclet, 31, comes in.
Using a mix of Bible-thumping zeal and unrelenting optimism, he hypes
a stable of companies for a
fee through Donner Corp. International. He founded the Santa Ana,
Calif., broker-dealer after a
peripatetic career on the fringes of the financial services industry.
“It’s like a public relations firm,” says David E. Rubbins, a New York
securities lawyer.
“The SEC would likely look hard at this kind of arrangement,” adds
Barry Barbash, a partner in
Washington with Shearman & Sterling who once ran the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s
division of investment management.
FULL DISCLOSURE
That arrangement is strictly cash, carry and buyer beware.
Given the precipitous decline of the Nasdaq Composite Index since its
peak last year, the OTC
market has become the elephant’s graveyard of dozens of
once-highflying tech companies. Many
are willing to shell out big bucks to try to regain some of the glory of
the tech boom.
Donner is one of about 200 firms that bottom-feed on the hopes and
dreams of wannabe moguls,
according to Key Ramsey, chief executive of Knobias.com, a website
he started after being
victimized in a penny stock scam. He follows 6,300 micro-cap
companies trading publicly on the
Nasdaq Small-Cap market and the Pink Sheets.
He says that Mr. Baclet and other brokers who tout penny stocks for
a fee are taking advantage of a
legal loophole to pump the price of a stock.
“Regulators we’ve talked to wish this would go away,” says Mr.
Ramsey.
GOD AND MONEY
Mr. Baclet, however, is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. He
opened the doors of his
broker-dealer in 1996, and he has never run afoul of Securities and
Exchange Commission
regulations, according to the federal agency.
However, some of the seven securities firms, one insurance company
and two realty firms he
worked for between 1989 and 1996 have.
Capital International Securities Group Inc. of Boca Raton, Fla., the
last company he worked for
before opening Donner, was hit with a class action in 1999 for
allegedly defrauding investors in a
pump-and-dump stock scheme that ran from August 1997 to August
1999.
Another of Mr. Baclet’s former Florida employers, GKN Securities
Corp., was ordered in 1997 to pay
$2.1 million in fines and restitution, according to NASD Regulation
Inc., the independent
enforcement arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers.
Between December 1993 and April 1996, the firm and 29 brokers
and supervisors allegedly
controlled the immediate after-market trading in eight stocks it
underwrote, and excessively inflated
those prices, according to the NASDR.
Mr. Baclet worked for Capital International Securities from July 1995
to December 1996 and GKN
Securities from August to November 1994. He was not named as a
defendant in the class action
against Capital International Securities, nor did the NASD name or
fine him for a role in the GKN
Securities case.
As well as pumping the hopes and dreams of penny stock moguls,
Mr. Baclet mixes Christian
evangelism with his investment advice.
His website, for example, provides a biblical justification to shun
trading on margin and gives
in-vestors an opportunity to donate to a fundamentalist Christian
charity that rails against Hollywood,
porn-ography and homosexuals.
SLIDING SCALE
For companies that pay a one-time fee, ranging between $3,000 and
$7,000, Donner publishes
press releases and “research reports” touting its penny stocks.
The higher Mr. Baclet can drive the stock, the greater the reward,
which can include stock options,
monthly retainers and fees that typically rise on a sliding scale along
with the stock price.
Mr. Baclet is quick to point out that his fee arrangements are fully
disclosed in accordance with SEC
rules.
“It’s clear it’s a fee-paid [service],” he says.
However, the information has a habit of finding its way into investor
chat rooms or onto computer
bulletin boards, where the disclaimer is sometimes not mentioned or
has been deleted.
In the case of Tickets.com Inc. (TIXX), an online ticket service,
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter analysts
gushed about the Costa Mesa, Calif., company when it handled the
initial public offering Nov. 4,
1999. The stock jumped to $32 a share, from an IPO price of $12.50,
before closing that day at
$19.25 a share.
Thursday the stock closed at 39 cents a share, and the Nasdaq says
the company is in line to be
taken off the exchange for failing to meet minimum listing
requirements.
Tickets.com was caught in last year’s tech-stock riptide and has
traded below $1 since November.
Donner took the company on as a client in December after the NASD
warned Tickets.com for the
first time that it was in danger of being delisted.
On Jan. 22, Donner issued a press release that glowingly described
the company’s prospects.
Donner’s research report on Tickets.com didn’t include a projection of
the company’s future earnings
on its cover or on any of its pages. Such projections are standard
fare for analysts’ reports.
The report does include, however, a quote from the Book of
Jeremiah.
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I
sanctified you,” reads the
quote, which appears under a box listing Tickets.com’s revenue.
The report gave the stock a “speculative buy” rating.
According to ratings group First Call Corp., a “speculative buy” rating
falls between a rating of “buy”
and “hold” and means a stock has more risk.
“We believe Tickets.com is highly undervalued considering it is moving
forward with a business plan
to revolutionize the online ticketing industry,” Donner wrote.
But in its annual report this month, Tickets.com warned investors that
it soon might cease to exist.
“If we are unable to obtain additional funding on satisfactory terms in
the near future, we’ll have to
modify our business plan, reduce or discontinue some or all of our
operations, seek a buyer for
substantially all of our assets or seek bankruptcy protection,” the
company cautioned.
Even so, Donner’s January press release caused a stir among
investors in chat rooms on Yahoo!
Inc.’s financial website.
A VOLATILE SWING
The morning the press re-lease was published by an online news
service, one stock jockey,
Mtanda_ 2000, copied it in full, without the disclaimer, in a message
with the subject as “good buy
recommendation.” The identity of the writer could not be learned.
Over three days, Jan. 19, 22 and 23, Tickets.com saw its volume
surge, respectively, from 374,000
shares, to 829,000 shares, to 2.2 million shares. The price climbed to
84 cents over that time, from
50 cents.
The next day, both the volume and price fell back — to 925,000 and
78 cents.
“Like a lot of penny stocks, it fluctuates quite a lot,” says David
Kathman, a stock analyst who has
watched, but not formally covered, Tickets.com for Morningstar.com.
Donner would have benefited greatly from any strong move in the
stock price, according to the
release. It said Tickets.com was to pay Donner 1,000 shares of
stock for its work.
If the stock had closed at $10, $15, $20 or $25, Donner stood to
receive an additional 1,000 shares
of stock for reaching each plateau.
In another release, Donner disclosed that it would receive $7,000,
plus a $2,500 monthly retainer.
But in its research report, it says merely that it received a $5,250 due
diligence fee and a $6,000
retainer. The report also made no mention of shares potentially owed
to Donner.
“They’re following the letter of the law, but not the spirit,” says Mr.
Kathman.
BULLISH
Mr. Baclet says that in all but one of the sectors it covers, his team
has no specialists. He says, “It’s
a team effort when we go into a project.”
He likens his practice of taking a fee to cover companies with market
caps barely in the millions to
Wall Street’s practice of refusing to write “sell” recommendations of
companies worth billions.
Indeed, once a business has signed up with Mr. Baclet, it is just about
guaranteed to get a bullish
rating.
Donner has pulled at least one company from the list — Far East
Adventures, a phone card
company that Mr. Baclet says didn’t give his analysts correct financial
information.
Since March 6, 2000, Donner has produced at least 104 favorable
press releases and not one “hold”
or “sell” rating, according to a search of Dow Jones Interactive.
In that time, the Nasdaq Composite Index has fallen more than 60%,
and all 18 companies that
Donner lists as clients on its website have seen their prices tank.
Mr. Baclet says huge swings in stock price are part of investing in
penny stocks, and he insists that
he is not a stock touter. In fact, in the past, his clients have been
winners, he says.



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 1:26:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
"Xybernaut Corporation (collectively referred to as the "Manipulated Securities")."
whafh.com

"Bear Stearns's relationship with some of the introducing brokers commenced as early as December 1992. The Introducing Brokers, as of the time they associated themselves with Bear Stearns, were sometimes known in the securities industry as "bucket shops" or "chop shops." The Introducing Brokers included, but were not limited to: Corporate Securities Inc.; First Cambridge Securities Corp. (defunct); Hillcrest Financial Corp., a/k/a HFC Capital Corp. (defunct); Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Inc.; Kensington Wells Incorporated (defunct); Lew Lieberbaum & Co. (defunct); Meyers Pollock Robbins, Inc. (defunct); Noble International Investments, Inc.; Paragon Capital; PCM Securities (defunct); A.R. Baron & Co., Inc. (defunct); D. Blech & Co. (defunct); Rooney-Pace Inc. (defunct); Stratton-Oakmont, Inc. (defunct); and Sterling Foster & Co. (defunct)(collectively, the "Introducing Brokers").
The Introducing Brokers engaged in a pattern of fraudulent conduct with regard to the Manipulated Securities. Bear Stearns, as clearing broker to the Introducing Brokers, knew or recklessly disregarded that the Introducing Brokers were engaged in a concerted course of conduct designed to defraud investors and violate the federal securities laws. Bear Stearns recklessly or consciously joined with each of the Introducing Brokers in defrauding plaintiffs and the Class in order to collect huge fees for performing clearing services for the Introducing Brokers as well as to gain enormous profits from transactions with the Introducing Brokers as more fully set out below.
This massive fraud focused on the Manipulated Securities, which included, but were not limited to: Advanced Surgical Inc.; Advanced Voice Technologies, Inc.; Applewoods Inc.; Apogee Robotics, Inc.; Aquanatural Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Ariad Pharmaceuticals Corp.; BioSepra, Inc.; Bristol Technology Systems, Inc.; Chemex Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Children's Wonderland, Inc.; Com/Tech Communication Technologies Inc.; Cypros Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Dollar Time Group, Inc.; DNA Plant Technology Inc.; Ecogen, Inc.; Embryo Development Corporation; Envirogen Corp.; Envro, Inc.; Eastco Industrial Safety, Co.; First Team Sports Inc.; Genemedicine, Inc.; Globus Group, Inc.; Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Gum Tech International Inc.; Hauppauge Digital Inc.; Help At Home Inc.; HemaSure, Inc.; ICOS Corp.; IFS International Inc.; Innovir Laboratories, Inc.; Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc.; Iatros Health Network Inc.; Krantor, Corp.; Kushner- Locke, Company; Kitchen Bazaar, Inc.; LaJolla Pharmaceutical Co.; Lasergate Systems, Inc.; Liposome Technology Inc.; LXR Biotechnology Corp.; ML Direct Inc.; Microprobe Corp.; Ministor Peripherals, Inc.; Neoprobe Corp.; NeoRx Corp.; Neurogen Corp.; New Vision Technology Corp.; Nu-tech Bio-Med Inc.; Pacific Animation Imaging Corp., later known as Strategic Solutions Group; Paperclip Imaging Software Inc.; Paramark Enterprises, Inc.; Symbollin, Inc.; Pharmos Corp.; Procept Inc.; Retrospettvia Inc.; Texas Biotechnology Corp.; Universal Automotive Industries, Inc.; Voxtel Advanced Mammography Systems Inc.; Videolan Technologies, Inc.; XeChem International, Inc.; and Xybernaut Corporation (collectively referred to as the "Manipulated Securities")."

whafh.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)2/28/2002 5:01:38 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Ba Ba Black Sheep have you any fool, yes sir, yes sir

a whole XYBERNAUT thread full

.-.' '; '-._ __ _
(_, .-:' '; '-._
,'o"( (_, )
(__,-'XYBER ,'o"( NAUT )>
( (__,-' )
'-'._.--._( )
||| |||'-'._.--._.-'
||| |||



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)3/3/2002 7:34:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Are they crooks? Did they hire a long long line of Fraudulent promoters to deceive the public? Is it well documented on this thread that they did?

Re: 3/1/02 - [XYBR] Wired: Online Company-Flamers: Beware Online Company-Flamers: Beware

By Jeffrey Benner 2:00 a.m. March 1, 2002 PST Dan Whatley has a few words of advice for those inclined to flame the CEO of an unpopular company. Whatley learned last week he had lost a $450,000 defamation lawsuit for statements he had made about a company called Xybernaut on an Internet message board. He said he didn't even know the suit existed. "I had no clue about this," Whatley said. After getting a copy of the judgment, he was even more confused. "What they say I say in the judgment is totally false and without documentation," he said. Xybernaut (XYBR) is a profitless Virginia company that makes wearable computers. Stephen Murphy, the Xybernaut lawyer handling the case against Whatley, said Whatley had been served notice of the lawsuit by certified mail. Whatley said the letter never came. With only one side at the hearing, a judge awarded the company a $450,000 default judgment -- a legal term for victory by forfeit. Lawyers say defamation lawsuits against message board posters by companies wanting to silence their online critics are on the rise. "It's not unusual," said Lee Tien, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a cyber-rights group. "We hear about people being sued for online posts -- and getting into crazy situations -- about once a week." "Typically, it's thin-skinned corporate executives whose companies aren't doing well," said Mark Goldowitz, who heads the California Anti-Slapp Project, a non-profit group that defends posters against frivolous libel suits. "They use this as a way to shut up the critics, and it also sends a message to other posters." Few of these suits make it to a courtroom. Often, in exchange for dropping a suit, companies demand a retraction and an apology, along with a promise that the defendant never posts about the company again. That's exactly what happened last year to Nora, a mother of three and full-time day trader from Houston (she requested her last name not be published). She was among several outspoken posters sued last year by Viragen, a small biotech firm in Florida that is trying to genetically engineer chickens to lay cancer-curing eggs. Although the company has been around for over 15 years, Viragen (VRA) has never turned a profit. The company recorded $718,000 in revenue last year and over $11 million in losses. Viragen CEO Gerald Smith earned $296,000 last year, according to SEC filings. In response to rumors that some posters had access to inside information, Nora criticized the company, calling the management "crooked." Within weeks, she was hit with a lawsuit. She called Viragen's lawyer. He demanded she post an apology on the message boards, and agree to stop posting, or the company would pursue the suit. Nora was stunned. "I was very surprised," she said. "I've been a day trader since 1995, and I've always posted my opinion on the boards." Inclined to fight, Nora consulted with an attorney who told her the case against her wouldn't stand up in court. "I told them to forget it," she said, refusing to sign the apology. But Viragen's lawyer didn't back down. As the reality of the costs of fighting a lawsuit filed in another state set in, she backed down. "I got scared," she said. "What if they tried to make an example of me? I wanted it to go away; it was too much of a hassle." Nora posted the apology, copied word for word from a document drafted by a Viragen attorney. She said the experience humiliated her. "When I wrote that letter, that was the worst thing I ever had to do," Nora said. "Those weren't my words. They got me." Despite important court rulings in the past year protecting the right to express critical opinions on message boards, suits against posters continue. Nineteen states (Virginia is not one of them) have laws protecting against frivolous litigation intended to suppress free speech. These "anti-SLAPP" laws allow defendants to recover their legal costs in suits deemed "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation." In Global Telemedia International vs. Does, a SLAPP suit tried in federal court in California last February, the judge ruled that typical message-board flaming does not meet the standard of defamatory speech. Such language must appear to be a statement of fact, not mere opinion. "The postings (in question) are full of hyperbole, invective, short-hand phrases and language not generally found in fact-based documents, such as corporate press releases or SEC filings," Judge David O. Carter wrote. That's a pretty good description of the postings Xybernaut sued Dan Whatley over, according to a copy of the suit. The suit lists posts in which Whatley berates Xybernaut chairman and CEO Edward Newman and his brother Steve Newman, who is the vice-chairman. "I have been dealing with the Newmans and XYBR and they are the most incompetent management I have ever seen," the suit quoted Whatley writing in one post, under his handle, dan7. "If Steve Newman was not a relative his job would consist of ... 'Would you like fries with that?'" Whatley also called the Newmans "liars" in several different posts. Not all defamation suits against online posters are frivolous, says Paul Levy, an attorney for Public Citizen who has defended many posters against defamation suits. The difference between defamation and a critical opinion is the specificity of the statement, Levy said. He cited one case in which the defendant, who lost the case, falsely accused a corporate executive of conducting medical experiments for Nazis. "If you go overboard, they're going to come after you," Levy said. "At a certain level, libel law plays a role and has value." To protect themselves from litigation, Goldowitz recommends posters be able to back up their online statements with evidence. He also recommends regular posters sign up for "personal injury" coverage option offered with most homeowner insurance policies. It covers legal costs if the policyholder is sued for defamation. For Whatley, it's too late; he doesn't have that kind of coverage. Now he says he has to use his son's college savings to pay for a lawyer he never thought he would need. "I just want a chance to defend myself," he said. © Copyright 2002, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reservedhttp://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,50548,00.html
wired.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4790)3/3/2002 8:05:04 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6847
 
Chat Room Rants Protected
by Jeffrey Benner

4:50 p.m. Feb. 27, 2001 PST


A federal court ruling last week could make it much more difficult for companies to successfully sue chat-room posters for expressing their opinions. A Los Angeles judge dismissed a lawsuit last Friday that sought to collect damages from "John Does" who criticized the company anonymously on Internet message boards. Privacy advocates say the decision sets an important precedent in the fight to protect anonymous speech online. The ruling on the case -- Global Telemedia International vs. Does -- found that the chat-room banter posted by the defendants were statements of opinion, not fact. Electronic privacy experts say that distinction sets an important legal precedent


r.hotwired.com