Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (160456)	2/27/2002 12:30:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Tony, the comment about Hammer running "as least as fast as the 'other' 64-bit CPU out there" might have been a whimsical understatement by AMD employees. After all, if their 0.13u copper SOI processor can't run any faster than a 0.18u non-copper non-SOI short-pipeline processor, I'd say they'd be slipping their schedule by at least six months. By the way, I don't expect this to happen, at least not for Clawhammer. Tenchusatsu

To: Tony Viola who wrote (160456)	2/27/2002 12:54:52 PM
From: kapkan4u	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

<About 733 - 800 MHz? Note that McKinley isn't "out there" in the traditional sense of the word, so if it's running at least as fast as what's out there now, have to assume Merced Itanium. > Are you grasping at straws or sticking your head in the sand? Kap