SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Gryba who wrote (160468)2/27/2002 12:07:21 PM
From: fingolfen  Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw, I had a 286 20 Mhz ( Don't recall the manufacturer ) and my roommate had a 386 25Mhz. Absolutely no difference.

I've had an opposite experience. When I was back in grad school, we had a program called Sigma Plot that we'd customized a data format to show a mass spectrum as a function of temperature and peak intensity. The comparisons between a 386, 486, and pentium machines were simply amazing. The 386 we had was clocked at 33MHz, the Pentium was either a 75 or a 100, and the 486 was a 50. What would take the poor 386 10 minutes to do, the pentium could do in 20 seconds.



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (160468)2/27/2002 5:28:21 PM
From: Gary G. Withrow  Respond to of 186894
 
I had a 286-12 desktop and a 386-16 laptop. The 286 was noticeably faster in all benchmarks. I especially noticed the difference when compiling C programs.

Gary