Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (160540)	2/27/2002 4:26:55 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

OK 733 MHz Hammer fanatic. Obviously, Anand has no hands on very high frequency experience. Message 17124015

To: milo_morai who wrote (160540)	2/27/2002 4:41:12 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Milo, Re: "Up only 500Mhz from last years IDF and Liquid cooled." That's a downplay, if I've ever heard one. Of course, we all know you are excited about Hammer, and eager to pooh-pooh anything exciting from Intel, but maybe you can answer the question on how competitive a Hammer processor can be if Intel can get a significantly higher clock frequency. Maybe AMD will get Hammer to clock much higher than Athlon, but Anand still thinks they aim to launch at 2GHz, while he also thinks that Intel is aiming for 4GHz next year. Right now, Intel is able to keep up with the Athlon while running 32% higher in frequency. Will Hammer's IPC improvements make much of a difference, if Intel can ramp frequencies to the point where they are, say, 60% ahead in frequency? wbmw