Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AC Flyer who wrote (15790)	2/28/2002 9:43:48 AM
From: Frank Pembleton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

AC -- this denial is going to cost you a fortune...

To: AC Flyer who wrote (15790)	2/28/2002 9:45:25 AM
From: Moominoid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

I used to think that, but then I learnt it properly and see its value. You only have to look at my prediction to the day that gold was heading down and it did.... that is TA working.... KKD has headed down from the day I gave my prediction on an e-wave basis. At other times things aren't so clear cut. I think gold will go lower than 285. Despite what many think there is some scientific basis for something like Elliott Wave and certainly for other forms of tradtional technical analysis. We recently had a discussion about this on the Big Kahuna thread. Of course most other economists and econometricians disagree with me... but they obviously haven't actually looked at the data or the relevant findings properly. Originally I thought that all TA was baloney, because as a good economist that's what I'd been taught to believe. David