SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (232236)2/28/2002 8:20:23 PM
From: JEB  Respond to of 769670
 
Why stop there Gordon, here's more food for thought:
________________________________________________________
Domestic Terrorism

Domestic right-wing terrorist groups often adhere to the principles of racial supremacy and embrace antigovernment, antiregulatory beliefs. Generally, extremist right-wing groups engage in activity that is protected by constitutional guarantees of free speech and assembly. Law enforcement becomes involved when the volatile talk of these groups transgresses into unlawful action.

On the national level, formal right-wing hate groups, such as the National Alliance, the World Church of the Creator (WCOTC) and the Aryan Nations, represent a continuing terrorist threat. Although efforts have been made by some extremist groups to reduce openly racist rhetoric in order to appeal to a broader segment of the population and to focus increased attention on antigovernment sentiment, racism-based hatred remains an integral component of these groups' core orientations.

Right-wing groups continue to represent a serious terrorist threat. Two of the seven planned acts of terrorism prevented in 1999 were potentially large-scale, high-casualty attacks being planned by organized right-wing extremist groups.

The second category of domestic terrorists, left-wing groups, generally profess a revolutionary socialist doctrine and view themselves as protectors of the people against the "dehumanizing effects" of capitalism and imperialism. They aim to bring about change in the United States and believe that this change can be realized through revolution rather than through the established political process. From the 1960s to the 1980s, leftist-oriented extremist groups posed the most serious domestic terrorist threat to the United States. In the 1980s, however, the fortunes of the leftist movement changed dramatically as law enforcement dismantled the infrastructure of many of these groups, and the fall of communism in Eastern Europe deprived the movement of its ideological foundation and patronage.

Terrorist groups seeking to secure full Puerto Rican independence from the United States through violent means represent one of the remaining active vestiges of left-wing terrorism. While these groups believe that bombings alone will not result in change, they view these acts of terrorism as a means by which to draw attention to their desire for independence. During the 1970s and 1980s numerous leftist groups, including extremist Puerto Rican separatist groups such as the armed forces for Puerto Rican National Liberation (FALN--Fuerzas Armadas de Liberacion Nacional Puertorriquena), carried out bombings on the U.S. mainland, primarily in and around New York City. However, just as the leftist threat in general declined dramatically throughout the 1990s, the threat posed by Puerto Rican extremist groups to mainland U.S. communities decreased during the past decade.

Acts of terrorism continue to be perpetrated, however, by violent separatists in Puerto Rico. As noted, three acts of terrorism and one suspected act of terrorism have taken place in various Puerto Rican locales during the past four years. These acts (including the March 31, 1998 bombing of a superaquaduct project in Arecibo, the bombings of bank offices in Rio Piedras and Santa Isabel in June 1998, and the bombing of a highway in Hato Rey in 1999) remain under investigation. The extremist Puerto Rican separatist group, Los Macheteros, is suspected in each of these attacks. The FBI has not recorded any acts of terrorism in Puerto Rico since 1999.

Anarchists and extremist socialist groups--many of which, such as the workers' world party, reclaim the streets, and carnival against capitalism, have an international presence--at times also represent a potential threat in the United States. For example, anarchists, operating individually and in groups, caused much of the damage during the 1999 WTO ministerial meeting in Seattle.The third category of domestic terrorism, special interest terrorism differs from traditional right-wing and left-wing terrorism in that extremist special interest groups seek to resolve specific issues, rather than effect widespread political change. Special interest extremists continue to conduct acts of politically motivated violence to force segments of society, including the general public, to change attitudes about issues considered important to their causes. These groups occupy the extreme fringes of animal rights, pro-life, environmental, anti-nuclear, and other movements. Some special interest extremists--most notably within the animal rights and environmental movements--have turned increasingly toward vandalism and terrorist activity in attempts to further their causes.

In recent years, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF)--an extremist animal rights movement--has become one of the most active extremist elements in the United States. Despite the destructive aspects of ALF's operations, its operational philosophy discourages acts that harm "any animal, human and nonhuman." Animal rights groups in the United States, including ALF, have generally adhered to this mandate. A distinct but related group, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), claimed responsibility for the arson fires set at a Vail (Colorado) ski resort in October 1998, which caused 12 million dollars in damages. This incident remains under investigation. Seven terrorist incidents occurring in the United States during 2000 have been attributed to either ALF or ELF. Several additional acts committed during 2001 are currently being reviewed for possible designation as terrorist incidents.

fbi.gov



To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (232236)3/9/2002 11:10:55 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 769670
 
PETA Under Attack for Funding Alleged Eco-Terrorists
By Jason Pierce
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 08, 2002

Washington (CNSNews.com) - As concerns about eco-terrorism mount on Capitol Hill, there is more finger-pointing aimed at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which admits to having provided financial support to a group allegedly connected to the terrorism.

But while PETA acknowledges that some of its money has in the past gone to the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), and to the legal defense funds for several Animal Liberation Front (ALF) members, the organization denies that any of its money "goes toward illegal activities."

The ELF and ALF are both loosely knit underground organizations that have taken responsibility for acts of arson and vandalism at colleges, animal farms, corporations, housing developments and even car dealerships over the past decade. The ALF was spun off of the ELF, which uses the slogan, "If you build it, we'll burn it."

Leading the charge against these groups is Rep. Scott McInnis (R-Colo.), chairman of the House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.At a Thursday conference entitled, "Stopping Eco-Terrorism," sponsored by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, McInnis reported that the "number one threat of violence in this country is eco-terrorism."

"Whether it is bombing an abortion clinic, or whether it is blowing up a mink farm, or burning down [a corporation], there is no place in our society. We cannot accept this kind of violence," McInnis said.

McInnis' subcommittee conducted a hearing on eco-terrorism last month, at which time, Craig Rosebraugh, a former spokesman for ELF, cited his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for every question he was asked. During that same hearing, James Jarboe, Domestic Terrorism Section Chief of the FBI, reported that the ALF and ELF have become "one of the most active extremist elements in the United States."

Thursday, Jarboe said "the FBI estimates that the ALF/ELF have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the United States since 1996, resulting in damages in excess of $43 million."

McInnis said he is concerned with the "lack of arrests and lack of investigations in regards to these acts of violence" and he added that it is time to go after the financial backers of such extremist groups.

"We need to increase awareness of some of these foundations and organizations who knowingly make contributions to the ALF and ELF, and other foundations who have no idea about what their money is being used for, which is usually just sent as part of their annual distribution," McInnis said.

On February 12, the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) reported to the subcommittee that in the last several years, PETA made donations to ELF and several defense funds for accused ALF members.

As a result of those findings, the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise (CDFE) petitioned the IRS Monday to strip PETA of its tax-exempt status.

"Why hasn't the IRS looked into this? Or Congress?" asked CDFE Executive Ron Arnold. "PETA continually encourages unlawful acts. PETA people have numerous
arrests.

"Tax exempt status is for charitable purposes. There's nothing charitable about encouraging arson," Arnold said. "Enough is enough. PETA should be stripped of its tax exempt status."

PETA spokesperson Lisa Lange acknowledged a $1,500 donation to ELF for a "project of habitat protection," which concluded, "meat eating is a huge problem for the environment."

"This is one of our focuses of our vegetarian campaign reaching to environmentalists, basically saying you can't be an environmentalist and eat meat, and the ELF was going to be doing some publicity on that very thing," Lange said. "We saw it as an opportunity to get our message out.

"None of our money goes toward illegal activities," Lange insisted. "This specific project we funded was a quality project."

Lange also said PETA is open about its contributions to the legal aid of accused ALF members. According to a release by the Center for Consumer Freedom, PETA made a $2,000 contribution to the defense of David Wilson in 1990, and $5,000 contribution to the "Josh Harper Support Committee."

Lange could not verify the dollar amounts.

"I'll suppose that those are true," Lange said. "It's not something that I have committed to memory because it is not that big of a deal, frankly."

Lange also said PETA gave $45,000 to the defense of Rod Coronado, an ALF member who was convicted of a fire bombing at Michigan State University.

"In the case of Rod Coronado ... he needed defense and we helped him," Lange said.

"Donations of support were given to those individuals (like David Wilson), because every person in America has a right to be considered innocent before proven guilty," Lange said. "They also have a right to a legal defense."

However, McInnis does believe PETA's claims.

"PETA clearly knew what their money was going toward, in my opinion," he said.

As far as the IRS investigation that CDFE is requesting, Lange said, "The IRS is welcome to come do an audit, absolutely, anytime."

CDFE President Alan Gottlieb said the IRS has waited too long to investigate groups like PETA, and hopes the report of the donations will finally convince the agency.

"The IRS has been slack in its oversight of this dangerous group. So we have had to issue a formal complaint to IRS Commissioner [Charles] Rossotti himself," Gottleib said. "We hope the IRS will take PETA seriously now."

McInnis referred to the "very selfish motivation" of organizaions like ELF and ALF in committing acts of terrorism, but pointed out that not all environmental groups are as extreme as those groups.

"Three-fourths of the major environmental organizations in this country hold [groups like ELF and ALF] in disdain," McInnis said. "They try to distance themselves from them, because they understand the real harm in somebody like ELF and ALF has on the other environmental groups out there.

"It is this kind of image that dilutes very sound messages other groups are trying to convey," he said.
cnsnews.com\Culture\archive\200203\CUL20020308a.html