SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: qveauriche who wrote (114737)2/28/2002 3:29:16 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Respond to of 152472
 
Great post, qveauriche, and a great way to reteach historical facts.

It is nice to know that sound minds still post on this thread and that they even make a reasonable attempt to "educate" those who think that they know it all but constantly trip up on the facts of the matter.

Enjoyed reading your wise and knowledgeable words.



To: qveauriche who wrote (114737)2/28/2002 4:08:03 PM
From: sal99  Respond to of 152472
 
qv-- You've captured the essence of why many of us are around here (despite recent and repeated travails). We shall overcome!



To: qveauriche who wrote (114737)2/28/2002 4:16:45 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Qveauriche,

Your post reminded me of a post by the_rich_janitor which I had bookmarked for posterity:

Message 13478589

>>>The funny thing about the 3G debate;
Maturity tells the story (not necessarily in order).....

The first debate: Will CDMA even work?
2nd Debate: Will anyone besides Korea even deploy CDMA?
3rd debate: Will any major European company ever except CDMA?
4th debate: OK, besides, Ericsson, Nokia, Philips, Siemens and SGS Thompson, will any other Europeans except CDMA?
5th debate: How far behind is US wireless technology behind Europe
6th debate: Will Europe deploy 2.5G or 3G before US?
7th debate: How far behind the US will Europe be in deployment of 2.5G and 3G systems.
8th debate: Europeans: let's debate something new
9th debate: Define 3G?
10th debate: Japan/Europe vs. USA/Korea?
11th debate: Now, Japan vs. itself
12th debate: Europeans trying to figure out which technologies are actually considered 3G
13th debate: WCDMA vs. cdma2000
14th debate; Does QCOM have essential IPR in WCDMA
15th debate: How much essential IPR does QCOM have in WCDMA
16th debate: What will QCOM do about the WCDMA ASIC market
17th debate: How much of the WCDMA ASIC market will QCOM own
18th debate:................

My point is that after listening to these debates over the past few years, I have learned that the people who choose to throw darts at the future, usually end up debating a non-issue and their predictions come back to haunt them. Amazing how these same people never admit defeat and just find a new debate that will not have an outcome for years to come. It's in the earnings you all.



To: qveauriche who wrote (114737)2/28/2002 8:23:52 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Respond to of 152472
 
Great post John. And I sincerely hope that one day we can convert you to a bull

Well one compliment deserves another. Yours was quite brilliant.

And I seriously hope one day to be a bull again. I don't make any money while my view is so bearish, 'cause I'm one of those dumb bears. Not one of the smart CFZ bears who shorts the overvalued pigs (their words)... I have a mental block about selling something I don't own... seems "wrong" to me. Irrationally, I know.

Of course, I don't lose any money, but it's much much more fun to watch a portfolio that grows faster than my lawn. So I'd like those days to come again. And believe me I don't hope that the price declines. I just expect that it will.

There's a difference. Like hoping to die and expecting to die. Rather profound difference, actually.

Which I think a lot of folks on the thread may have misinterpreted.

John