To: qveauriche who wrote (114737 ) 2/28/2002 4:16:45 PM From: carranza2 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472 Qveauriche, Your post reminded me of a post by the_rich_janitor which I had bookmarked for posterity: Message 13478589 >>>The funny thing about the 3G debate; Maturity tells the story (not necessarily in order)..... The first debate: Will CDMA even work? 2nd Debate: Will anyone besides Korea even deploy CDMA? 3rd debate: Will any major European company ever except CDMA? 4th debate: OK, besides, Ericsson, Nokia, Philips, Siemens and SGS Thompson, will any other Europeans except CDMA? 5th debate: How far behind is US wireless technology behind Europe 6th debate: Will Europe deploy 2.5G or 3G before US? 7th debate: How far behind the US will Europe be in deployment of 2.5G and 3G systems. 8th debate: Europeans: let's debate something new 9th debate: Define 3G? 10th debate: Japan/Europe vs. USA/Korea? 11th debate: Now, Japan vs. itself 12th debate: Europeans trying to figure out which technologies are actually considered 3G 13th debate: WCDMA vs. cdma2000 14th debate; Does QCOM have essential IPR in WCDMA 15th debate: How much essential IPR does QCOM have in WCDMA 16th debate: What will QCOM do about the WCDMA ASIC market 17th debate: How much of the WCDMA ASIC market will QCOM own 18th debate:................ My point is that after listening to these debates over the past few years, I have learned that the people who choose to throw darts at the future, usually end up debating a non-issue and their predictions come back to haunt them. Amazing how these same people never admit defeat and just find a new debate that will not have an outcome for years to come. It's in the earnings you all.