SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (2877)2/28/2002 7:22:32 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
I think he might have a point where he says that a lot of the "conservative press" is more biased then the so called mainstream press, but the "mainstream press" doesn't go around calling itself liberal, and most of the biased conservative sources are sources of opinion not news. Talk Radio is more biased then the Washington Post, but it isn't supposedly and unbiased mainstream news sorce. If you just look at the news from the WSJ, Fox News, or the Washington Times, I don't see it as being any more biased then the news from The New York Times, or CNN.

The "mainstream" press might attack Democrats along with Republicans, but it does not present conservative ideas as often or as fairly as liberal ones. For example you rarely get a story about someone defending themselves or someone else with a gun, and when it does happen the gun often isn't mentioned. Apparently the "mainstream" press wouldn't want to publish news that would support any of the NRA's ideas.

And then there's Enron. Is there any doubt that if the situation were reversed, Republicans would be exploiting the scandal more aggressively? Would they have hesitated, as Democrats have, to frame Enron as a political scandal, or to bombard the White House with subpoenas? Democrats can't afford to go all wobbly, especially now."

Yes there is a lot of doubt. Besides Enron has connections to Democrats as well. Trying to pin it on Republicans really is just a partisan witch hunt. Its a scandal for Enron and Arthur Anderson, not the current administation or Republican in congress.

Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform (who, like most conservatives I spoke with, doesn't buy the idea that Republicans fight more ruthlessly than Democrats)

I agree with Norquist. The Democrats have been brutal. Its a dirty game that both sides play.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (2877)3/2/2002 10:31:26 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
I kind of like Kurtz, but lets face it, he's a lap dog for the Post. His bias is evident throughout the article. Even the title is deceptive. No one said there is a 'conspiracy', so he starts his piece by planting a red herring and goes downhill from there. He says 'conservative pundits attempt to advance their cause with every utterance while liberal pundits are at heart political reporters....'

Assertions like that aren't even worth responding to. I think Howie is turning into Marvin Kalb. Patrick Ruffini has a response to that Kurtz column.
patrickruffini.com

Early in the Washington Monthly piece, the guy writes that Gore "high-mindedly" sought a recount, Bush's Republicans "sternly" disagreed, having gotten their way already through "thuggishness". I stopped reading right about there. But the piece has created some buzz, so I will make a point to read the rest of it, but after coffee....