SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Night Writer who wrote (95558)2/28/2002 6:11:38 PM
From: Night Writer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Battle for Hewlett-Packard Shareholders Turns to Wall Street

NEW YORK, Feb 28, 2002 (Austin American-Statesman - Knight Ridder/Tribune
Business News via COMTEX) -- In a last-ditch pitch to Wall Street,
Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive Carly Fiorina deployed a parade of business
heavyweights Wednesday who support her company's proposed acquisition of Compaq
Computer Corp.

Before dozens of analysts, she played a videotape of pro-merger testimonials
from several well-known names, including DreamWorks co-founder Jeffrey
Katzenberg, AOL Time Warner Inc. Chairman Stephen Case and New York Stock
Exchange chief Richard Grasso.

The message from all: bigger is better.

"This deal makes a lot of sense to our company, said Citigroup chairman Sanford
Weill in one taped testimonial, adding that a company's scale "really is
important."

Wednesday's daylong plea to the investment community to support the
controversial deal comes before shareholders vote March 19. Even on Wall Street,
few are willing to predict the outcome.

Andrew Neff of Bear Stearns said the shareholder vote still seemed "too close to
call," although he added that shareholders tend to go with the wishes of
management.

Rob Enderle, an analyst with Giga Information Group, said that although
Wednesday's presentation was a strong effort to win Wall Street's support, it
might not be enough to bring about the merger.

"The business environment has certainly changed a lot since this merger was
announced," he said. "The Enron scandal has created far too much risk for a lot
of institutional investors."

Since the acquisition was announced on Labor Day, Walter Hewlett, son of one of
the company's founders, has emerged as its most vocal opponent. For months, he
has argued the deal would make the company too dependent on low-profit personal
computers.

David Packard, son of the other founder, also has pledged to fight the merger.
Indeed, both families and the boards that run their trusts have vowed to vote
the 18 percent of shares they own against the merger.

On top of this opposition, several institutional investors with significant
blocks of H-P stock have said they will oppose the merger. The latest came
Tuesday from Brandes Investment Partners, which as of December owned 1.3 percent
of the shares.

Fiorina and other top executives repeatedly insisted Wednesday that the
California company's $21.7 billion purchase of Houston-based Compaq would create
new opportunities for the global provider of computing and imaging services.

"All of our businesses are not where they need to be," said H-P Chief Financial
Officer Bob Wayman. He said the company's pro forma earnings per share in 2003
could be $1.51 with Compaq or $1.35 without it.

Although Fiorina and the others emphasized the merger's financial up sides, they
also railed against the heirs, saying the heirs were trying to mislead investors
with a string of deceptions, the latest of which is a claim that Fiorina and
Compaq CEO Michael Capellas could see huge payoffs.

Hewlett charged Tuesday that Fiorina and her counterpart at Compaq, Michael
Capellas, would gain $117.4 million in bonuses and pay raises over two years if
the merger's goes through.

Fiorina called Hewlett's charges "one of his most egregious attempts yet at
distraction."

"How can we disclose what has not yet been decided?" she asked, referring to
compensation plans.

Fiorina also tried to counter Hewlett's charges that employees were
overwhelmingly against the merger by emphasizing that her company's management
team was well-acquainted with the employees and that by and large, they were
enthusiastic about the merger.


By Shelley Emling
To see more of the Austin American-Statesman, or to subscribe to the
newspaper, go to austin360.com