SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (14053)3/1/2002 12:37:19 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 78673
 
1) the scale

Good point.

2) Income statement accounting is based on expenses being matched with revenues. Saying options show up in dilution doesn't cut it, because that shows up years later. Take a very clear example. I got paid last year. That showed up on my public company employer's income statement. I also got bonuses. That showed up on its income statement. (Don't worry, I'm not even a rounding error!). But they also gave me options. That was something of value paid to me for work I did last year, but it shows up nowhere on the company's financial statements. Whats the difference bewteen that and cash compensation IF THE INCOME STATEMENT IS SUPPOSED TO REFLECT WHAT IT COSTS TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR SERVICES. Thats the problem.



But it costs nothing. The options only cost the company a small amount to administer the options program. Yes they do have a cost to the shareholders in terms of dilution but that isn't a cost to the company it is just devideing the same company over more shares. But if you do decide to count that as a cost the cost of the dilution doesn't show up until and unless the stock is diluted. If they are never exercised there is no cost to the shareholders. If they are exercised the cost is the dilution and shouldn't be double counted by lowering earnings and spreading out the lower figure among more shares when you calculate EPS.

Tim



To: James Clarke who wrote (14053)3/1/2002 11:52:31 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78673
 
James,

>I got paid last year. That showed up on my public
>company employer's income statement. I also got bonuses.
>That showed up on its income statement.
> But they also gave me options. That was something of
> value paid to me for work I did last year,
>but it shows up nowhere on the company's financial
> statements.

And yet another non sequitur. My company is located in
beautiful city of XXXXXXXX, but it does not show up as
my compensation in its financial statements.
My boss is a great person but it does not show up as my
compensation in company's financial statements.

But it should...it's compensation...because if I did
not get it, I would leave for another company
that paid higher salary, more stock options or
was located in Hawaii...

And I was not joking in another post. In right
circumstances, I would work for FREE. How would you
account for my compensation then? Add fictional
"comparative salary" to the income statement?
And how would that differ from me taking let's say
MSFT options at strike price $1000?

Jurgis - argue the real things like dilution, but don't draw illogical conclusions



To: James Clarke who wrote (14053)3/1/2002 1:03:02 PM
From: Don Earl  Respond to of 78673
 
<<<any smart value investor will tell you a Black Scholes theoretical valuation is garbage.>>>

I've never taken time to study the Black Scholes pricing model, but I'll take your word for it. I don't do a lot in the way of trading options, but I have done enough that if there is anything in the way of a standard pricing model being used in the open market, I've never been able to figure out what it is. Anarchy reigns on the CBOE.

Are we up to 20 posts on options yet? <g>