SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (36281)3/1/2002 5:48:36 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69746
 
WEEKEND INVESTOR

Five accounting tricks to watch for
Investing tip: Don't want to play CPA? Here's what to do

By Deborah Adamson, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:06 AM ET March 1, 2002




LOS ANGELES (CBS.MW) - It's getting mighty difficult for small investors to pick stocks these days when even pros trained in scrutinizing balance sheets are getting snowed by the likes of Enron.

Amid heightened scrutiny of companies' financial stability, shadows are being caste even on venerable blue chips such as IBM (IBM: news, chart, profile) and General Electric (GE: news, chart, profile).

Doubts about accounting firms such as Anderson also are mounting, while faith in Wall Street analysts -- several of whom went before Congress this week to defend their long-maintained "strong buy" recommendations on Enron (ENRNQ: news, chart, profile) -- has all but crumbled.

"It's the old dilemma: Reveal vs. conceal."

John A. TracyAuthor"How To Read A Financial Report"


And here's the kicker: If a company is bent on fooling investors and Wall Street, there's little one can do to detect it, experts said.

Yet amid all this shattered trust lies an overlooked truth: Most companies are "basically honest," said John A. Tracy, professor emeritus of accounting at University of Colorado, Boulder and author of "How To Read A Financial Report."

Still, companies wrestle with the desire to cast their business in the best light without breaking accounting laws, Tracy said. As such, some choose to practice "aggressive" accounting and take liberties. "It's the old dilemma: Reveal vs. conceal," he said.

With no company seemingly immune from accounting scrutiny in the current environment, how should individual investors navigate this minefield? Here are five red flags investors should watch for.

1. Earnings are rising, but cash flow is flat or declining. When a company's profits are going up, its cash flow should be moving in tandem, said Mark Sellers, editor of the Morningstar StockInvestor newsletter. After all, higher profits mean more cash comes through the door. But the two figures sometimes move in opposite directions.

It's important to remember that earnings are not the same as cash flow. A company's net income doesn't just reflect the actual cash left over after expenses are taken out of sales. The bottom line also reflects non-cash items such as depreciation, or the value an asset loses over time.

Cash flow, however, only measures the money going in and out of a company. When earnings are rising, but cash flow is stagnant or dropping, take heed. The company could be "stuffing the channel," Sellers said.

A company could ship more goods to retailers than they ordered and book it all as sales. This inflates revenue, resulting in higher profits on the income statement - but not cash. Instead, these extra products appear as an increase in accounts receivable - bills a company expects or hopes its customers will pay.

"It's very common, especially in the tech world," Sellers said.

Check Securities and Exchange Commission filings - the 10-K for yearly and 10-Q for quarterly reports - at Freeedgar.com for a company's cash flow and income statements, as well as balance sheet.

2. Sales or revenue per employee soars. A good way to find out if a company is inflating the top line is to calculate the total sales or revenue per employee, Tracy said. Enron had recorded sales per employee of $9 million -- astronomical compared to its peers and most companies, Tracy said.

The figure will vary by industry, but a general rule of thumb is to suspect any number over $500,000 per worker, he said.

An ever-climbing sales per employee number shows that a company's business might be booming but it hasn't hired more workers in proportion to handling the extra load. Be wary.

3. Boosting earnings from an "over-funded" pension plan. This refers to traditional pensions -- where an employer provides retirement benefits to the employee without the latter contributing any money -- unlike 401(k) or 403(b) plans.

The company has the burden of investing this money and making sure it's set aside enough to meet retiring workers' needs. To do so, it makes calculations based on assumptions about the investment rate of return, salary increases and the like.

A company that's desperate to boost earnings can, for example, increase the expected rate of return - which will result in a larger value for the pension plan. As such, the company might not have to deposit any money into the plan that year or cut back on its contributions, since it's fully or over-funded.

As a result, the firm just saved some extra money - boosting profits. TRW (TRW: news, chart, profile), Qwest (Q: news, chart, profile) and GE have been criticized for this practice, Sellers said.

Pension information should be disclosed in a company's SEC filing and annual report. Scour the footnotes carefully, Sellers said.

4. Taking too many "extraordinary" or "non-recurring" gains or losses. Let's say a company discovered one of its plants is unproductive and decides to close it. It could take the closing expenses and count them as an extraordinary loss in the quarter, since this type of activity doesn't happen everyday.

But in a "big-bath" approach, a company could decide that it should include other charges and take the hit at once, freeing future earnings from damage, Tracy said.

So the firm will "write off everything but the kitchen sink," he said. Tracy's advice? Look for companies that are using this practice less than others.

5. Suspicious "related-party transactions" It's smart to read the footnotes in a company's financial reports pertaining to "related-party transactions," Sellers said. You might be surprised at what you find. Verisign (VRSN: news, chart, profile), for one, allegedly boosted sales by investing in a small start-up business that turned around and used the cash infusion to buy products and services from Verisign, he said.

Investing tip:

Investors who don't want to play the accountant have two options: Diversify across industries with at least 10 to 15 individual stocks or stick with industries you know, said John Bajkowski, a financial analyst at the American Association of Individual Investors.

With diversification, a meltdown in one stock could be offset by gains from others. By focusing on areas with which you're familiar, you'll be able to see if a company's financials make sense.

Deborah Adamson is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in Los Angeles.



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (36281)3/1/2002 6:08:10 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 69746
 
For Adaptec, "Scuzzy" Spells Success

By Eric C. Fleming

Adaptec's "scuzzy" past is making it sexy again.

No, not scuzzy as in grungy, but as in techies' pet name for SCSI (Small Computer System Interface). That technology is used in personal computers and servers to link disk drives to computer networks and peripheral devices like scanners.

Investors hungry for anything storage-related after September 11 bid up Adaptec shares by 60%, to a recent close at 11.40, from its 52-week low of 7.20 on September 21. And the stock rose 46% in 2001, while the Nasdaq Composite index lost 15% last year.

The reason: Adaptec's core business is doing fine. Late last month, it beat the three-analyst consensus estimate of a nickel a share, earning eight cents in its third fiscal quarter that ended December 31, as sales slipped to $105 million, from $160 million.


The Milpitas, Calif. company got about 80% of its 2001 sales of chips, controllers and adapters from the storage software business, selling to the likes of IBM, EMC and Dell Computer. The rest came from products for desktops and storage networking.

Adaptec, whose market capitalization is $1.2 billion, is particularly well-positioned for the next big trend in data storage -- networking.

After years of building vast systems to store information, corporations now want to move data storage from the server or mainframe to the network itself -- and they don't want to spend too much money in the process.

That's why market research firm IDC forecasts that storage devices attached directly to the network (like servers) will shrink to 35% of the storage market in 2005, from 80% in 2000.

Adaptec should gain from the trend to storage networking through iSCSI, a form of "scuzzy" based on Internet Protocol (IP), which is cheaper than other technologies and can help networks extend easily around the world.

This promising business is expected to take off in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2003, reaping an estimated $37 million, or 7.9% of Adaptec's sales, from only $13.1 million, or 3.1% of revenue, in the current fiscal year, says Paul Mansky, an analyst at CIBC World Markets, who rates Adaptec a Buy. (Mansky says he doesn't own the stock, and CIBC doesn't do investment banking for Adaptec.)

From there, iSCSI is expected to keep growing at a double-digit rate for Adaptec, says Lawrence Creatura, portfolio manager at the Turner Small Cap Value Fund, whose $500-million fund has less than 1% of its assets in Adaptec stock.

On the desktop front, Adaptec, with a 400-million-unit installed base, hopes to get consumers to upgrade to faster, more profitable connectors that can help them burn CDs and edit digital photos.


To be sure, Adaptec has been hurt by weak demand for PCs and servers, since its wares are used in both. That's partly why the stock price has slid 37% from its 52-week high of 18.49 in January.

But last month, Sun Microsystems, an Adaptec customer, indicated that sales were beginning to pick up again after several quarters of decline.

The stock has had its ups and downs, too. On Wednesday the shares fell 15%, or 2.02, on volume six times its daily average, after Adaptec announced plans for a $250-million offering of convertible bonds.

Investors worried that current holders of the company's 106 million outstanding shares could face dilution and that arbitrageurs might buy the notes while shorting the stock. So, Adaptec ended up selling only $225 million of the bonds Thursday at a conversion price into common stock of $15.31, and the bonds can't be called for three years.

Still, "[the offering] does not change the fundamental value of the company," says Bob Straus, portfolio manager of the Icon Information Technology Fund, which holds 3.5% of its assets in Adaptec. Strauss pegs Adaptec's intrinsic worth at 17.50.

David Katz, who runs the Matrix Advisors Value Fund, which has 3% of its assets in Adaptec, is buying the stock at current levels.

"[The offering] is not a bad thing; it just caught the market wildly off-guard," says Katz.

But what's all the money for, considering Adaptec already has $605 million in cash its coffers? In its press release, the company cited "general corporate purposes," including "potential acquisitions." Adaptec officials were unavailable to comment before deadline.

Creatura says an acquisition of a small, private company would be a smart move. (Last year Adaptec acquired Platys, a provider of iSCSI.) Such early-stage technology firms could spur growth without adding too much debt to Adaptec's balance sheet, he adds.

Adaptec now trades at about twice its book value of $6.00 per share. That's a discount to its ten-year median of 3.3 times book, according to Thomson Financial/Baseline.

Adaptec also sold at only three times trailing 12-month sales, versus 11 times for competitors QLogic and 12 times for Emulex.

Its stock changes hands at 40 times the 28 cents a share consensus for its fiscal 2002, ending March 31, and at 27 times the 42-cent consensus for fiscal 2003, according to Thomson Financial/First Call. That's roughly in line with Adaptec's anticipated annual long-term growth earnings growth rate of 35%.

Of course, the economy may not recover as expected, and technology spending may remain anemic. Also, iSCSI technology may not become as popular as Adaptec's fans expect.

Yet, with plenty of cash, a strong balance sheet and bright prospects for its technologies, Adaptec may find that "scuzzy" translates into "profits" for shareholders.