Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (320)	3/1/2002 8:00:29 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

LOL! We have a little tradition in this country called "the Rule of Law". When one citizen sues another citizen and is required to answer under oath, those answers are supposed to be truthful. Especially when the answers are coming from someone who has taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and laws of the US. Especially when those answers comes from the nation's highest executive officer. What Clinton did was to attempt to deprive another citizen of her day in Court. In the course of doing so he lied under oath, misled the Court, knowingly submitted phony affidavits to the Court and generally acted like a scumbag. The subject of the lie is really irrevelant. The principle involved is central to the preservation of the American way of life.... JLA