Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (333)	3/1/2002 8:23:49 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

You just don't get it. Clinton lied under oath and submitted false affidavits in a civil suit brought by another citizen where he was required to answer questions posed to him truthfully under oath. This is called perjury. The civil suit concerned his sexual misconduct with the citizen, Ms. Jones. He then continued to lie to a federal grand jury and the IC compounding a problem he already made for himself. The IC was tipped off about the false testimony and authorized by Clitnon's own AG to investigate the matter. Those are the FACTS. Notice, I included no irrelevant hypotheticals about you. I am speaking solely of what actually transpired. It was an egregious breach of his oath of office which he further compounded by obstructing justice, tampering with witnesses, misuing the power of his office to cover his sorry lying butt, etc... I'm pissed because he felt himself above the law, in fact above a law he signed into effect which governs the rest of us mere mortals. There is no rational way to minimize this misconduct. It goes the very heart of what the rule of law is all about..... I am quite sorry you seem unable to grasp that.