SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (406)3/1/2002 9:54:51 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Really, I've never seen you post such an indictment of the rapist president before. You hit nail on head.



To: E who wrote (406)3/1/2002 9:55:04 AM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
You should be thanking her. That's the only post I've read on the subject of the Broderick case which sounds remotely reasonable. -g

Not that I agree that Clinton can be fairly called a rapist. "Innocent until proven guilty", yadda yadda. I do think he has a history of acting excrebly** where women are concerned, though, and the Broderick case is example number one.

** SI spell-checker rejected this and other spellings. boo hoo


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News