Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (427)	3/1/2002 10:39:44 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 21057

Sorry. You are wrong. The rule of law must be respected. That was what was at stake. And it was not excessive to see that rule vindicated.

To: Lane3 who wrote (427)	3/1/2002 11:20:32 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21057

If one believes Clinton is a rapist who managed to get away with it, why on earth wouldn't one pursue him disproportionately for provable crimes, like sexual harassment, perjury and obstruction? Also, regarding the WTC attack, would such an attack have occurred if Clinton had apprehended Bin Laden when he had the chance? Instead, he seemed to spend most of his time raising campaign cash and pondering the circumstances of his next ejaculation.