SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (459)3/1/2002 11:47:11 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
If one believes Clinton is a rapist who managed to get away with it, why on earth wouldn't one pursue him disproportionately for provable crimes, like sexual harassment, perjury and obstruction?

I have no problem with pursuing him, proportionately or otherwise, for crimes. Beat him up in a back alley. I'd probably knee him, myself, if I got a chance. I have a problem with impeaching him. Run him through the courts and hang him at high noon. Fine by me. Just don't risk our government's stability with something that was not directly a function of his job as President.

Also, regarding the WTC attack, would such an attack have occurred if Clinton had apprehended Bin Laden when he had the chance? Instead, he seemed to spend most of his time raising campaign cash and pondering the circumstances of his next ejaculation.

You can look at that both ways. He could budget his time for campaigning and ejaculating. He lost control of his schedule when the impeachment forces blew (no pun intended) everything out of proportion. One could just as easily, more easily, blame the distraction of the impeachment for any inattention to business. If one didn't have a partisan blood lust, that is.

Karen



To: Bill who wrote (459)3/1/2002 11:54:21 AM
From: SirRealist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
>>Instead, he seemed to spend most of his time raising campaign cash and pondering the circumstances of his next ejaculation. <<

I'm sure this is how it seems to those fascinated by such subjects.



To: Bill who wrote (459)3/1/2002 5:09:43 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 21057
 
One problem that made it harder to prevent the 2nd (successful) WTC attack is that after the first one we revealed that we could intercept satellite phone conversations. We did this to demonstrate evidence against the people who tried to destroy the WTC with bombs and then of course bin Laden an co. stopped using satellite phones to discuss their plans.

Tim