Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (154080)	3/1/2002 11:39:57 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

I like that theory, but not sure where we close -- Mon or Tues should be good for da Bears

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (154080)	3/1/2002 2:51:22 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

got another theory? <vbg>

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (154080)	3/1/2002 11:09:43 PM
From: SOROS	Respond to of 436258

Remind me not to go "double or nothing" on your reco. ;) Seriously, people like Fleck have always "made sense", but in a money-loving nation, being right does not necessarily translate into being rich. It should come crashing down again at some point. I don't believe you can re-inflate a bubble anywhere near the time frame it did its most vertical leaping (ie late 1998 to early 2000). So that means sometime this year reality should matter again. Keep in mind that all this "optimism" is TOTALLY discounting the potential disasters which loom constantly -- terrorism, Arab/Israeli war, China, N. Korea, Russia, Iraq, Iran, earthquake at major implosion time-frame, etc. etc. etc. -- any ONE of which could totally destroy this tread-hanging economic "recovery". A combination of events staggers the mind at what could happen. Oh, well. Party on! I remain, SOROS