Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bacchus_ii who wrote (72889)	3/1/2002 9:44:10 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 275872

Bacchus ii Re...Don't work. It would implied that AMD think they would get a TBRED at 3400+.<<<<<<<<< The statement would imply that if your interpretation of that statement was correct. I haven't heard of any announcement, implied or otherwise, that Hammer would come out lower than 3400 QS, or that Hammer would be near 2.8ghz. Where does Joseph get his 2.8 ghz.? I don't think anyone here believes that is correct. And by his wording of "impressive claims", I think he feels AMD is too optimistic for Hammer. Some people are dropping out the Italics part, and saying that gives Johnatons true meaning. What if we were to drop out the part between comas "with some pretty impressive claims for the Hammer family" Then the sentence would read The company provided the latest processor roadmap, with a 2.8GHz (our estimate; their claim is a 3.4GHz) P4 equivalent part shipping by the yr. 2002. If Johnathon felt that Hammer wouldn't get out this yr.; then what would AMD's fastest part be at years end? On AMD's roadmap, a 2800+ TBRED is supposed to be released 4q-02. That is the part I think Johnathon is thinking of. I realize it isn't a Hammer, but I don't think Joseph necessarily said it was, when he put out his report. Just MHO.