Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (160846)	3/1/2002 4:27:51 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, over on the mod thread, they're trying to decide how fast Hammer is going to be, what clock speed, etc., using the 3400 QS rating AMD put on the roadmap, and what some analysts have said. There is no consensus in anything among them, not even WRT whether QS is related to given AMD chips (Palo or Tbred), or Intel (P4) chips. Throwing in an expected IPC growth factor for Hammer, and other things, and they're all over the lot on what Hammer might be. If that group of hang on every word fanatics can't agree on QS, how can the rest of the world, plus dog, have any chance of knowing what the f^&% it means? Tony