Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (638)	3/1/2002 7:29:54 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 21057

An Admiral or 2nd lieutenant could expect a court-martial for Clinton's behaviour. And a court-martial can impost a far worse penalty then the Senate could have in the impeachment trial. Tim

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (638)	3/1/2002 8:59:55 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Why should a law against sexual harassment apply to me but not the President? Lewinsky charged Clinton with sexual harassment? Huh, I never realised that was what he was impeached for... Harassment wasn't the crime. Nor is a consensual BJ a crime - if it is, than plainly it's the law out of step with human beings (admirals or otherwise). That argument might pass, except that Clinton's predecessor and successor don't display this problem. Quote me in full context and your argument is answered.