Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (72903)	3/1/2002 7:37:28 PM
From: bacchus_ii	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

RE:"They just can't say it is." They do say it is IMO. see Message 17136670 Gottfried

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (72903)	3/1/2002 7:50:24 PM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

<font color=green>Fig 1. The two Hammer demo systems AMD had on display, one featured the SuSe 64-bit Linux OS, and the other was running a 64-bit version of Windows XP. This movie requires the Windows Media player to be installed and requires a broadband connection for streaming playback. The AMD people were pretty excited about both the performance and the compatibility of the first Hammer silicon, they were also quick to comment that there’ve been very little issues with getting a 64-bit OS such as SuSe Linux or Windows XP to run on the new CPU, it basically ran out of the box. As mentioned they also had different mechanical samples of the CPU, they differ most in pin-count as the server version of the Hammer will have a 128-bit interface to main memory whereas the desktop version will have a 64-bits interface. hardwareanalysis.com I heard Win64 earlier. Any more word on this?