Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (72918)	3/2/2002 1:56:54 AM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 275872

Joe re: I don't think it is a shame, or anything like that, since IMO, there will be some performance boost for the single processor, agreed, one way or another clawhammer this year would be an achievement. the rest is way above my limited scope of knowledge :-)) Regards -Albert

To: Joe NYC who wrote (72918)	3/2/2002 3:11:00 AM
From: Petz	Respond to of 275872

Joe, if the demo systems had a single DIMM populating the two slots, then it would have to be single channel. But if they had two DIMM's, I would almost guarantee that Clawhammer is already dual channel because it is easier to get a single DIMM system working than a double DIMM system. Furthermore, the applications they demonstrated certainly didn't need more than 256M of memory. A single 256M or 512M DDR DIMM would have provided plenty enough memory. Why populate the motherboard with 512M or 1024M, when 1) It makes the demo less reliable and 2) The memory isn't needed Petz