SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (160888)3/1/2002 11:21:05 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
But..the 34% yield for the PaloMeatHead will probably be HIGH compared to the even poorer yielding 0.13 micron SOI process - why do you think it is 12 months late - and getting LATER ?

It's humorous to remember back to the AMD apologists who claimed AMD had used 50% of their fab capacity in Q4 for .13u, so that was why the output was so low. Here we are 5 months after they supposedly started all those .13u wafers and still they're nowhere in sight... Wonder what the excuse is now?

EP



To: Paul Engel who wrote (160888)3/2/2002 1:10:40 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: why do you think Clawhammer is 12 months late?

Word is, the Hammer engineers got an Itanic to test, and were laughing too hard to work for several months.

Is Itanic's hilarious lack of performance Intel's secret weapon?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News