Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (36045)	3/2/2002 9:42:46 AM
From: exp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Larry, Who Needs Bottom When COMP Gonna Do 2500 lol

To: TREND1 who wrote (36045)	3/2/2002 10:12:52 AM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Larry: You might as well say again that it is a "new bull market" along with your statement that the "bear died on Sept. 21, 2001 <g>." In fact, I think it is time for you to start such a thread for all those who believe it is a new bull market and to give us price targets on the next leg up. History says you are wrong; I can argue with you all day long but I won't argue with history <g>.

To: TREND1 who wrote (36045)	3/2/2002 4:09:16 PM
From: 16yearcycle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Larry, you shouldn't be waiting for the fed model to show undervalued, imho. Unlike almost everyone here, let me suggest that the e numbers MAY be really low. For example, it's not a stretch that peak dow e in this up leg hit 1000, a gain of say 10% compounding from 2000 to 2005. So what will the dow be at the end of 2005 if e are expected to hit 1100 in 2006?(expectations always too high at the end of the cycle, and too low at the beginning?). Not that you shouldn't draw the line somewhere, but why not use an error of 5%?