SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Softechie who wrote (3377)3/2/2002 10:08:31 PM
From: Softechie  Respond to of 16631
 
Palm, Gateway to Testify Against Microsoft
By Peter Kaplan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nine states still pursuing an antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. will call executives from Palm Inc. and Gateway Inc. to testify in court hearings to help make their case for severe sanctions against the company, according to a court filing on Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT



The states, who have refused to sign on to a settlement between Microsoft and the U.S. Justice Department, listed executives from the two companies among more than a dozen witnesses they plan to call during hearings set to begin on Aug. 11 on what sanctions should be imposed on Microsoft, according to pre-trial statements filed with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.

Anthony Fama, a group counsel for Gateway, will testify ''that the states' proposed remedy is necessary to prevent Microsoft from continuing to favor personal computer manufacturers who support Microsoft's products, to the

disadvantage of personal computer manufacturers who do not,'' the dissenting states said in their court filing.

Fama ``will testify that Microsoft's Proposed Remedy does not prohibit this behavior,'' the states said.

In addition, Michael Mace, Chief Competitive Officer of Palm, will testify that Microsoft ``has attempted to block Palm's development through anti-competitive actions such as blocking access to Microsoft's development tools,'' the dissenting states said.

``FAILS TO ADDRESS CONCERNS''

Mace will also testify that the states' proposed sanctions are ``critical to ensure that Palm can continue to interoperate with Microsoft's Windows platform in the future'' and that the Justice Department settlement ``fails to address Palm's concerns,'' the states said in their pre-trial statement.

Microsoft has repeatedly criticized the states' proposed sanctions as radical and harmful to consumers, and said in its pre-trial statement it will call its own witnesses, including many company executives, to make that case.

The software giant reached the deal with the Justice Department in November after an appeals court in June upheld a lower court conclusion that Microsoft had used illegal tactics to maintain its Windows monopoly.

The settlement, among other things, would give computer makers more freedom to feature rival software on the machines they sell and prevent Microsoft from retaliating against them.

Nine of the 18 states in the lawsuit agreed to sign on to the deal, but the other nine are still pursuing the case.

The dissenting states, which include California, Massachusetts and Iowa, say their additional remedies would close a series of settlement loopholes. It also would force Microsoft to sell a cheaper, stripped-down version of its Windows operating system and disclose the system's inner workings.

Kollar-Kotelly will hold a hearing starting on March 6 on whether the proposed settlement is in the public interest. Separate hearings on the demands for tougher sanctions will begin on March 11 and will likely run for 6-8 weeks.



To: Softechie who wrote (3377)3/3/2002 2:40:32 PM
From: yossarian67  Respond to of 16631
 
TXN's wasn't a warning...last earnings call they said revenue would be flat, and they released a similar statement on 2/20---seems as if they're managing expectations thru the quarter with weekly(or nearly so) updates.....but their release Friday matches the revenue/earnings expectations by the street for the quarter and the third time they've given the outlook. Not an upside statement and not a warning either.