SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (2529)3/2/2002 11:20:16 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Can he appeal that case?

Maybe he just ignored it thinking nothing would happen? Kinda dumb but you never know.



To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (2529)3/3/2002 7:41:22 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Since the plaintiff claimed Whatley was served via certified mail, it should be a simple matter to look at the receipt and see if he signed it or not.
If plaintiff screwed up and defendant was never legally served, seems to me the whole thing should get tossed out, w/plaintiff billed for court costs.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News