SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160952)3/3/2002 9:40:34 AM
From: dale_laroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
>I can already predict that at least one person will bring up the fact that the Palomino core has scaled to within 15% of the top speed that Intel was able to achieve with Willamette, and this will then give them the impression that AMD can come within 15% of the clock speed of Northwood, thus giving them 2.6GHz by the end of the year - even without SOI.<

Such an assertion would be absurd. Intel switched to copper along with doing a shrink to 0.13-microns. Barton might come within 15% of Northwood's peak speed grade, but Thoroughbred would be lucky to come within 25%



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160952)3/4/2002 12:42:44 AM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 186894
 
bmw
re: "the Droids will drool all over themselves next week when Anand and all the cheerleader sites publish their benchmarks of the latest 0.18 micron PaloMEatHead - QuantEnronSpeed 2100+. Duh...it ain't 0.13 and it ain't SOI !!"
talking about constructive criticism (your words), you found enough sense in the above to continue the discussion
re: AMDroids are still going under the assumption that AMD is using true
even is true, I recall that few years back smaller gate length was a sign of intel's process technology superiority (Yousef and many more).

Why don't we just get out and say it honestly - if it is different from intel then intels is superior no matter what the differences are.

Regards
-Albert