SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (975)3/3/2002 4:50:49 PM
From: jcky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
< The intelligence is not an attribute of the thing, it is what shapes the development of the thing. >

So let me follow you correctly. Intelligence isn't quite a characteristic of this thing but it (intelligence) shapes the development of it (this entity)? So is there a Higher Order of Intelligence to oversee the intelligent development of the Universe? And how many layers of this onion can we peel before we find nothing?

I don't find the question of intelligence pertaining to design a non sequitur at all. If intelligence is not essential for the existence of life then why should there be intelligent design? In the cosmological time frame, intelligence is a rather new development on the evolutionary scale. Who's to say in another 5 million years that intelligence finds itself down an evolutionary dead end. And this is especially true if homo sapiens' ability to develop weapons of mass destruction continue to outpace their impetus to use them.

You cite that it is a fallacy to read a pattern in the random juxtaposition of elements. But I don't find this a contradictory statement. If mathematical calculus can integrate an infinitesimal pathway to derive at a finite answer, I find it entirely plausible to arrive at an orderly process from underlying chaotic elements. In fact, quantum physics is based entirely upon probability and statistics.

Playing with dice... as you would say.