SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (18579)3/3/2002 6:56:49 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 34857
 
re: Nokia 5210 Review

Pictures & Facts:

nokia.com

>>Test: Nokia 5210

February 27, 2002
Matteo Dal Pra'
Miranda Drew
GSMBOX

uk.gsmbox.com

Introduced a few months ago by the prolific Finnish company, the Nokia GSM 5210 is one of the most interesting new offers in Nokia´s recent production. At a price of about 294 euros, the GSM 5210 has been on the market for a few weeks, available in most European stores. Because of its price and series number (5000) Nokia assigns this model to the middle area of its own range of cellular phones.

After due consideration of its technical characteristics and functions, however, it could be assigned to one step above the sought-after and by now mythical 8210. The 8210, which has been one of the best sellers of the 8000 series, is soon-to-be retired, seeing as it is no longer in production and, excluding re-editions, can only be found as warehouse leftovers.

This is important because the 5210 has inherited the software, the user/graphic interface, and absolutely all of the functions of the 8210. The 5210 also has new functions that will be described later on, and new rubberised covers, now called Shells, which should make the phone more shock and water-resistant. Because of this, as the 6250 is the “reinforced” version of the 6210, this model should technically be called 8250. But as this identification number has already been used for a model designed for the Asian market only, the 5210 could have been called 8230. It’s a mystery why Nokia has been creating so much confusion with its numbers lately (see also the 6510 which has almost nothing in common with the 6000 series!)

Seeing the close kinship in this review, we will make continuous references to the parent 8210. For example the “fabric” is very similar to that of the 8210 as well as the battery opening (and also the battery, naturally.) The slot for the SIM card is also the same (luckily it was not made like the terrible one for the 8310/6510.) Obviously, with voluminous rubber shells the external dimensions are larger with respect to the 8210, but not by much (105.5 x 47.5 x 22.5 mm vs 101.5 x 44.5 x 17.5 mm). Also the total weight (battery included) is slightly greater (92 grams vs 79 grams): 13 grams of difference are not felt very much. It’s much less of a difference than the 133 grams of the 3330, 40 grams of difference are noticeable!

The rubber shells should make the telephone more resistant to shocks and spills. We say “should” because in the User’s Manual Nokia does not guarantee anything in that sense, also because there are no silicone seals (as on other similar models) or Gore-Tex membrane (as on the massive Ericsson R310s) nor does it seem that more resistant electronics or welding were used. Therefore, it is not a “very strong” telephone, like its big brother (in every sense) the 6250. The latter is an honest to goodness almost indestructible telephone, in the sense that one can calmly throw it against the wall (without exaggerating however), or submerge it in water (not for too long) without any damage...only the latter, therefore, is a real telephone for construction sites or extreme sports. Instead, the 5210 is slightly more resistant and less permeable to liquids than a normal telephone, a bit like the reinforced Siemens M35 or ME45, but not like the Nokia 625 or the Ericsson R310s or R250 (which is no longer in production), which have actual armour. In any case, the 5210 seems to be a very solid and robust telephone and the closure of the two quite hermetical shells is well made. The finishings and quality of the materials used are optimum.

The function buttons, placed in the upper part of the phone, are in hard silver plastic. They rispond to commands quickly and well. The alphanumeric buttons, placed in the bottom part of the phone, are instead made of rubber that is not very soft. They are very close to each other but sufficiently wide and comfortable to use. Also these respond quickly and well to commands given. The display is the same as that of the 8210, high resolution graphics with the same dimensions. What has changed is the illumination, which is now an orange/amber colour, very pleasing as well as an absolute novelty for a Nokia phone.

The new characteristics do not stop here. We can find different, more or less important ones inside the telephone. The first is represented by the Wap browser in version 1.1 with a Wap Push function, for receiving desired information from the web. The browser accepts up to 5 profiles and can memorise up to 15 bookmarks. As the phone is not GPRS, the navigation speed stops at 14,400 bps (if the web supports it).

A small, but very useful addition is the automatic keyboard block which Nokia finally decided to introduce in its new models (also the brand-new 6510 has it). The functioning of the keyboard block is regulatable at your pleasure, thanks to a programmable timer. For example you can set it to automatically block the keyboard after 10 seconds of inactivity.

Another interesting and useful addition is the possibility to time the mode, or set the activation of the mode (Silent, Meeting, Outside, etc.) for a determined time. For example, if you go to a meeting that lasts about an hour, you can set the Meeting mode for the duration of the meeting, so that at the end of the meeting you will not forget, as usual, to reset it to normal mode. Or at night, in order not to disturb people who are sleeping, you can set the Silent mode to last until dawn.

The 5210 is probably the only GSM to have a particular innovation, that is the thermometer function, which allows you to measure the external temperature. The thermometer is not professional and the result is very approximate, as in our tests it always indicated a temperature that was a few degrees higher than the actual one.

As on the other recent models from the NorthEuropean company, the 5210 contains animated and non-animated screen savers, which can be associated to different user modes. In all there are 16 screen savers, among which is one which allows you to see a full screen digital clock, another which, aside from showing the time, shows the date as well. Who knows if one day Nokia phones will have the date displayed also in standby! Other personalisable features can be found in the vibration setting which can be set alone, with the ring tone, before the ring tone (first it vibrates and then rings) and can also be rhythmic. This last setting is also availbe for the illumination (a solution already seen in the Telit GM822.) With respect to the 8210, but already seen on other models in the Nokia range, other additions are the chronometre, countdown, SMS chat, SMS length of 450 characters, and the new games Snake II, Pairs II, Bantumi, Space Impact, and Bumper. These are all functions which attract the eyes of young consumers, but not only them.

The last, and most captivating addition is definitely the function of the Picture Editor, which will be enjoyed by the young and by SMS maniacs. This function has already been anticipated on the 3350 Asian model, and is now present on this captivating European GSM. This editor allows the user to create drawings from zero or to modify existing drawings (to attach to SMS messages). Using a virtual pen with continuous or discontinuous lines, nets, circles, squares, and predefined Clip Art. To move the pen you use all the number keys: 2 and 8 to go up and down, 4 and 6 to move left and right, and 1, 3, 7 and 9 to move diagonally. The shapes you create can be “coloured” in black, white or gray (dotted). Arming yourself with patience and a lot of imagination you can create fun, pretty and best of all original drawings than the predefined ones (there are 10, plus more than 6 screens of Clip Art.) Those who love SMS will go crazy!

The remaining, numerous functions are the same as the 8210, slight modifications notwithstanding

- date, alarm clock and time that you do not need to reset every time you change the SIM, (which happened with the 3000 series) thanks to a battery plug;
- agenda containing up to 100 appointments, birthdays (which are remembered every year) and various notes. You can also use icons to personalise the notes;
- telephone book with an internal memory of 250 numbers (aside from those available on the SIM card);
- Voice Dial, to call up to 10 numbers vocally;
- calculator and exchange function
- 5 personalisable user modes
- 35 predefined ring tones (some new), plus another 7 you can download via SMS
- updatable T9 for easy SMS writing;
- Finally, even though many people think that it is not there, there is the IrDA infrared port.

It is taken for granted that the user interface is the simple and intuitive one as always. The audio quality is good but not excellent. With high volume, the trasmitted voice arrives a bit metallic, as with almost all Nokias, with slight static in the background. Using analog for the transmission and reception quality is good but not excellent. The sensivitity is a bit lacking, but overall the signal is unstable. This is a typical limit of the GSMs with integrated antennas (except for rare exceptions, see the Alcatel 511.) Instead, the connection to the web and research are fast if the signal is good.

The 5210 is gifted with the 750 mAh BLB-2, which is already noted and used (by the 8000 series and the 6510.) The telephone is parsimonious, it consumes little. It easily lasts over 100 hours in standby (also on the 900 MHz band), with mixed usage (standby and a few calls) four/five working days are available without problems (turning off the phone at night.) Apart from the shells all of the accessories are compatible with those of the 8000 series telephones (8210, 8310, 8850, 8890) and also the “out of production” 6510.

The series accessories are scarse: just one battery, the classic travel battery charger ACP-7 (slow), the User’s Manual and a telephone case made of little belts to attach the telephone to your trousers. A peculiarity of this belts is that, hear hear, actually, smell because they are scented! Since when have mobile phones been scented? Data Suite, the software for connecting to the PC is not included on the packaging, but you can download it free from the Club Nokia site.

The 5210 is sold with only one series shell, only in blue/orange. We have not seen them on sale, but optional shells are planned in another 4 colours: blue/light blue, blue/shy blue, blue/green and blue/yellow. The sale price is about 294 euros, not much to tell the truth, if you consider that the 8210, even having fewer functions, is sold at the same price (except for unusual promotions). Many think that the public which the phone is aimed at is so young that they are not willing to pay more than 200 euros for a mobile phone (it’s enough to see the success of the 3310 and 3330, the most successful among youth.) The right price, according to us, should be around 250 euros. But seeing the strange commercial strategies of Nokia, which recently reduced the price of the 5510, the 5210 could fall in price soon. The terminal we tested was produced in February 2002, with software version 5.12 from 17-01-02. It has not presented any software bugs or hardware problems as yet.

CONSIDER ALSO...

With about 60 euros more it is possible to find the optimum Siemens ME45 which is also reinforced to resist against shocks and spills, slightly bigger but with a much wider display. It does not have the thermometer or message editor, but it does have integrated viva voice and a GPRS modem (with many serial cables) and that’s not nothing. Or with 30 euros less it’s possible to buy the Ericsson T65. It is not rubberised or waterproof but still has a solid and robust construction (thanks also to the integrated battery) and is equally small but has a much larger display. It does not have the thermometer but it does have the plus of having GPRS which is probably a more interesting function!

VERDICT

This is a GSM of generally good make, solid and robust, with reliable software. The software on which the 5210 was developed is the same as the 8210, enriched with some functions. The main functions are: Wap 1.1, thermometer, screen savers, automatic keyboard block, timer for user mode and the innovative and fun Picture Editor. This last function will make SMS maniacs go crazy. As simple as it is genius is the rubber shell solution, which makes the phone more resistant to shocks and spills than a normal GSM. Pay attention that it is not (almost) indestructible like its big brother the 6250. The audio and reception quality is good but not excellent, (on 900 band or 1800 MHz). The operative autonomy is more than satisfactory, it surpasses four/five working days. Yet again Nokia has demonstrated itself to be an innovator in the field with an “invention”, the rubber shells, simple but effective (like the covers for remote controls), which probably will not take long to become popular, as the interchangable covers have done. <<

- Eric -



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (18579)3/3/2002 9:45:23 PM
From: JohnG  Respond to of 34857
 
Ilmarinen. Looks like a new combatant w/ $100 billion cash in the bank -- seems a little late to the game--like they were with Internet Explorer when Netscape was entrenched. More fireworks no doubt.

The MS plan for smartphones: Get
Nokia!
By John Lettice
Posted: 25/02/2002 at 16:59 GMT

The real weather was cold in Cannes last week, but
Microsoft couldn't have asked for a better climate in
which to roll out its smartphone/PDA roadmap to the
assembled scribes of GSM World Congress 2002.
Arch-rival Symbian CEO Colly Myers had fallen on his
sword/hung it up amicably after a valiant and successful
battle* on the eve of the show, resulting in the
"postponement" of the new version announcement
press conference and a severe exec-deficit.

Microsoft on the other hand had a plausible story, is
never short of execs, spieling, for the use of, and had
Nokia firmly in its cross-hairs. The Register, having on
day one perhaps ill-advisedly described one of the first
visible products of Microsoft's new phone reference
design strategy as a small brick, found Microsoft Mobile
Devices VP Ben Waldman become unexpectedly
available for our 9am slot on day two. In the good old
days you could be hundreds of miles away before it hit,
but things happen so fast on the web that you can hear
marketing discussing whether the story you've just
written is more down on Microsoft or Nokia while you're
choking on your pre-interview coffee.

"Angmar will see you now, Mr Lettice."

But as it turns out, Waldman's a pretty good sport who's
prepared to tangle over things away from the overheads
and the sound-bites; he has a pitch to make, obviously,
but there's enough to that pitch to convince you that he
has a good shot at success.

The sound-bites first though, as delivered at the launch
event the previous day. By producing mobile phone
reference designs manufacturers can run with,
Microsoft and its friends are bringing "decades of data
experience" to the business. In mobile phone design
previously, "software was almost an afterthought... we
see software as becoming a key enabler." Microsoft will
bring the rich experience of the PC to the mobile
phone. You shouldn't have to be a "second class
citizen" on the Internet just because you're a mobile
user.

There's more, but you get the picture - the reference
designs will be the key enablers that establish a
platform anybody can build, Microsoft software
expertise will build wondrous, rich experiences atop that
platform, and GPRS/3G will mean you get the whole
Internet from them, not just an edited experience. As a
reality check we asked ARM VP Steve Evans how much
longer he reckoned bandwidth constraints would apply,
he said five years at least. And GPRS barely worked at
all in Cannes during show hours - funny that.

One of the first things I put to Waldman, who was ably
assisted by product manager Ed Suwanjindar when he
could get a word in, was that the plan was to use a kind
of retread of the PC OEM relationship by way of the
Xbox to create a coalition of little guys (PC companies
counting as 'little' when it comes to mobile phones),
using a common platform to outflank the existing phone
players. It seemed to me that Microsoft had now tacitly
accepted that it'd never sign up the Motorolas,
Sony-Ericssons, Siemens and Nokias of this world. He
demurred, merely accepting that Nokia would probably
never sign up, but that the others were still possibilities.
More on that anon.

Nor did he accept that the Xbox model and the
reference design one were essentially different aspects
of a corporate blueprint that had been deemed a good
thing. Xbox is by its nature a fixed design specified by
Microsoft and built under contract, whereas on the one
hand the MS-TI and MS-Intel reference designs are so
specific that Microsoft can say to people "here's where
you can buy the bits," while on the other they can use
"as much or as little of the product as they want." There
are things like buttons they can't remove, because the
software wouldn't work if they did, but according to
Waldman it's pretty flexible. According to me that's
having your cake and eating it, but waht do I know?

The differences between the TI and Intel co-operations,
incidentally, are that the TI reference is largely aimed at
smartphones while the Intel is smartphones and PDAs,
and that the TI design was ready to roll by its
announcement last week, whereas the Intel will be there
later this year. There's obviously been a substantial
period of co-operation between MS and TI prior to the
unveiling, while Waldman isn't specifically telling how
long or how short the Intel deal's been running.

How about the accusation that the small band of
partners Microsoft has on board so far aren't
experienced in building phones? He points out that
Compal, the Taiwanese manufacturer Microsoft
announced at the show, builds for the big names and
produced around five million last year. Less than Nokia,
granted, but good business and experience
nonetheless. Sendo, the outfit set up by a clutch of
Philips defectors, has mainland China production. It
also has a deeply screwy idea of what you use
approximately $75,000 worth of yacht rental (an
informed estimate) for. A huge party? Apparently not,
but it was not quite as quiet as IBM's $75,000 worth
(which if I know my IBM cost more in the region of
$150,000), and anyway I didn't know all this when I was
talking to Waldman.

I argue with him about the 'Microsoft will never build
hardware' one. I can go into a store, buy something with
Compaq written on it, it's probably been built in Taiwan
under contract. So Compaq doesn't build hardware
either, right? He declines the philosophical challenge
and says the word "Microsoft" won't appear on
hardware. What's this then, I say, pointing to the
reference design phone on the table, which says
Microsoft on it. It's got to have something on it to show
the manufacturers where their badge would go, right?

OK, draw. But we're getting into interesting territory
here, because there's a particular reason in this
particular field why not making hardware has particular
significance. That's right, the N-word.

Nokia does software, and Nokia builds hardware, the
best-selling hardware. The Symbian partners of course
are all shareholders in Symbian, and Symbian designs
are available equally to them all, but the way Waldman
tells it, Nokia is calling the shots. And maybe there's just
enough truth in that for it to stick; Nokia is certainly far
more successful than the other partners, who are more
than likely to resent how effectively the company has
eaten their lunches. I argue that it's not Nokia's fault that
Motorola cancelled Odin, nor Nokia's fault that Ericsson
built worse phones than Nokia did. But you can see why
some people might go for betrayal rather than their own
failings as an explanation. The 1918 analogy does not,
fortunately, occur to me at the time.

Ed gets a word in. "They [i.e., Nokia's partners in
Symbian] are the ones who've approached us. Lately
people tend to call more often with more interest." But
no names, no promises of a big coup announcement
later this year. Waldman (who is clearly doing this
deliberately - he wants it to be known he's gunning for
Nokia) says Nokia has more or less taken over
Symbian, and you can see why "Motorola,
Sony-Ericsson and Matsushita would be upset." Nokia
has "strung them along for years, then stabbed them in
the back." They must be asking themselves, "at the end
of the day, does Nokia have my best interests at heart?"

It is wondrously, outrageously, partial stuff, but it could
play. These are indeed deadly rivals in there, and
attempting to drive a wedge in could pay dividends,
particularly as two of them (Motorola and Ericsson) have
been doing a deal of strategy revising over the past
year or two, and might ultimately be persuaded it was all
a dumb idea anyway. And tagging Nokia as the problem
is far smarter than going for Symbian as a whole,
because that might unite them.

We cover design, where he argues that one chip with
two different processors is a good idea perplexingly
calling it integration, and I am unconvinced (this is
something Symbian has historically poked fun at). We
cover pricing, where he cunningly dances clear of my
attempt to weasel the licence fee tab out of him (mail
me, somebody, preferrably with the agreement
attached), and points to a "certain set of companies
who charge exhorbitant amounts for services." I can't
get him on the cost Win2k Server, that's not his
department, and he won't accept my contention that
screwing the early adopters for a huge wedge then
dropping the price to confetti 12 months on is just the
way of the world, and something Nokia is pretty damn
good at.

But his trophy of the show appears to be the certain
company that charges $6.5 million for 10,000 users,
which is Nokia, and which is for MMS Server. Because
Nokia is a software company too, and maybe that's
another reason why it's in the crosshairs. But as I say
he's good fun, and prepared to argue his corner. And
although I disagree with him a lot, I'd buy him dinner for
a good row any time. Don't you just hate it when you like
them? ®