SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fred Levine who wrote (744)3/4/2002 10:27:29 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 25522
 
Soon it will be time to begin discussing 450mm....

Guess who has two 450-mm wafers...
Here's a trick question: What's the installed base of blank 450-mm wafer substrates in the world today?

Well it's unclear and pretty small, but Intel Corp. has a grand total of two blank 450-mm wafers in its possession for R&D purposes, according to officials from the Santa Clara, Calif.-based company.

The company believes that it will not be ramping up 450-mm wafer fabs at least until 2014, said Gerald Marcyk, director of components research within Intel's Technology and Manufacturing Group. Wafers based on 450-mm substrates is "a 'disruptive' technology," Marcyk said during a presentation about Intel's IC manufacturing efforts at this week's Intel Developers Forum (IDF) in San Francisco.

It will take Intel another 12 years to move to 450-mm technology. In comparison, it took Intel about 10 years to make the transition from 200-mm to 300-mm technology.--M.L.

---

...and guess who made them
Another tricky question is which silicon materials merchant made the 450-mm wafers for Intel?

Intel isn't saying, but a good bet is that the company is one of Intel's current silicon suppliers. At present, sources say Intel has three wafer suppliers: Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Wacker Siltronic AG as well as SUMCO, a new joint venture between Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd. and Mitsubishi Materials Corp. --M.L.



To: Fred Levine who wrote (744)3/4/2002 2:01:51 PM
From: Gottfried  Respond to of 25522
 
Fred, that's a new thought for me and I think your reasoning is correct. >Negative recommendations have more validity than positive ones.<

Gottfried