Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16088)	3/4/2002 4:38:44 PM
From: No Mo Mo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

You were the one who said "for another few billion anyway". It seems like you implied there was some limit. Did I misunderstand?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16088)	3/5/2002 1:43:07 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

<<We certainly don't need Herr Raymond [Heil Raymond] or Scott or some other "I know what's best for you" bossy do-gooder telling women how to run their lives.>> Come on MQ you know better than that. In most countries where the population is running wild it's the MEN who are keepin them pregnant and barefoot. They don't have a choice. Their child bearing lives are run for'em by the husbands who want lotsa children. Government policies in most countries are designed to encourage childbirth. Where as if we leave this choice up to the woman government policies should be neutral,no? Enplain to me why I should be required to subsidize with my tax dollars some one else's breeding habits? You're not talking choice here you're talking adgenda!