Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (161105)	3/5/2002 11:17:52 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, The P4 laptop benchmarks suck. Why get a P4 when a P3 laptop is almost as fast? techtv.com Only big difference is the Geforce 2 vs Geforce4 video. Steve

To: Dan3 who wrote (161105)	3/5/2002 2:05:42 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Blow Girl Dan - re: "Now we wait and see how the new mobile Athlons do." Wait? The "new" mobile AThyWipeys were launched months ago !! And you're still waiting !!

To: Dan3 who wrote (161105)	3/5/2002 2:08:26 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Blow Hard Dan - Re: "Intel has proven P4 that it isn't competitive in the profitable high end notebook space." It isn't? Not according to this: "Powered by the Mobile AMD Athlon 4 1500+, the Compaq Presario 700Z offers 1.3 GHz of processing power in a sleek silver-and-black unit. At 6.5 pounds, it just escapes being too heavy for frequent travel. And at $1,722 (direct), it's downright affordable. Unfortunately, the 700Z took last place on all of our speed tests. How much of that is due to the Athlon chip and how much to the other components (especially the S3 graphics subsystem) is impossible to say. The bigger question is why Compaq would marry what should be a premium-performing mobile chip with lower-performing parts. Another problem: The notebook refused to enter PowerNow! optimized mode. No amount of reinstalling and tweaking would get the function to work, even though Windows XP has support for it. Still, battery life on our test was a respectable 2 hours 13 minutes. With PowerNow! working, it could approach 3 hours." pcmag.com