Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161150)	3/5/2002 3:11:30 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: update on P4-M performance You must be a real moron. You've compared a system with a GeForce 4 to a system with an S3 graphics chip and concluded the performance difference is the CPU.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161150)	3/5/2002 3:52:41 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Tench, Re: "update on P4-M performance:" I also notice that the Pentium 4-M based notebook gets more battery life than either the Athlon 4, or the Pentium III-M. Astonishing, IMO. wbmw

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161150)	3/5/2002 6:49:03 PM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>Oh, and Athlon 4 1.3 GHz (QuantiSpeed rated 1500+) scored 41.7% less than a P4-M at 1.7 GHz.< But is that with SSE enabled or not enabled for Athlon 4?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161150)	3/5/2002 9:59:02 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten re: scored 41.7% less than a P4-M at 1.7 GHz. The credibility of "QuantiSpeed" is starting to collapse with the mobile segment. boy, I lost all respect for you right here. Been a "tech" expert you sound on the same level as Yousef <ggggg> It did not occur to you strange that pIII-M @ 1.2Ghz outperformed athlon-4 @ 1.3GHz (actual frequency) by the same amount 40%+. Amazing, is not it? And I do not mean the article but rather how brainwashed you are.... I am giving you benefit of a doubt here Geeees...... ps I really thought that you are better than that but ......

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161150)	3/6/2002 4:59:28 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu, Oh, and Athlon 4 1.3 GHz (QuantiSpeed rated 1500+) scored 41.7% less than a P4-M at 1.7 GHz. The credibility of "QuantiSpeed" is starting to collapse with the mobile segment. With 4 different systems (in your link) with possibly no 2 component in common among the 4 of them, you are ready to conclude that: The credibility of "QuantiSpeed" is starting to collapse with the mobile segment. I think you need to think twice before coming out with conclusions like these, if credibility is important to you. Joe