Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (234125)	3/5/2002 9:48:57 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Yeah, Shahak's rant is very long - I dread having to get into it. Shahak is a militant atheist. He is not to be trusted IMO. He once idolized David Ben Gurion. He loved him till he heard him make a semi-religious allusion in a speech and became a bitter enemy of Ben Gurion. This is per Shahak himself. He is one of those whose religion is atheism. And I didn't like that in the first paragraph, he accused Bialoguski of employing terror against him. He did nothing of the sort, of course. Shahak sure can't handle criticism can he. Then he rants about church state issues in Israel. Ok they have a big problem there but it isn't relevant to what his critic wrote. He goes on to attack rabbis for accepting contributions from criminals and supporting a politician who had committed adultery. Hmm this guilt by association. Why shouldn't guilt by association go both ways, I think, being aware Shahak is quoted as an authority on Jewish religion on EVERY racist, pro-Nazi website around. Enough - just too long of a rant. His general thesis is the Jewish religion is wicked and teaches Jews to rob and murder non-Jews. This is ridiculous. Just use your head. If it were true our prisons would be packed with Jewish murderers and armed robbers. There are some there but relatively few.