Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: porn_start878 who wrote (73476)	3/5/2002 5:14:35 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 275872

Max, Re: "But to answer your questions, why didn't Intel announce Yahmill to developpers? The answer would also answer to your questions." What if... a) Yamhill doesn't exist, or b) Yamhill is several years down the road. However, you build up a nice argument under the assumption that: c1) Yamhill will be in Intel's upcoming Pentium 4, and c2) Yamhill will have to follow in the footsteps of Hammer. I don't feel that it's best to assume 'c' for right now, though. Evidence still says that IA-64 will do quite well for Intel, and basing its success on the current Development Platform volumes doesn't seem applicable, IMO. wbmw