Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Paint The Table -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (17817)	3/6/2002 12:55:49 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23786

This Market's Getting Ready to Rock By Howard Simons Special to TheStreet.com 03/05/2002 04:29 PM EST With apologies to both Cool Hand Luke and Alan Greenspan, what we have here is failure to exuberate. The U.S. macroeconomic news has been getting stronger to the point at which no one should question whether the general recession is over, and yet the market has been struggling to get out of its own way. I've said for years that when the technicals and the fundamentals diverge, you have to go with the technicals. Any windbag with a shoeshine and a business card can pontificate on what the market should be doing, but the technical structure of the market shows you what people actually are doing with their money. If we view price as a convergent search process for value, we must accept the premise that the underlying economic value of any asset must lead price. Price must then catch up to value. Generally, price overshoots value, but that's another story altogether. While the meek are out there pretending they've inherited the earth, and the bombastic have been getting rallies thrown back in their face for the better (worse?) part of two years, market tension is accumulating. The unleashing of liquidity and resolution of affairs to the upside will come with greater risk acceptance. Let's check out some credit market indicators to see if this is about to happen. Credit Spreads We can compare the yields on various grades of corporate bonds with 10-year maturities, as provided by Standard & Poor's CreditWeek, to the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, to get a sense of investor sentiment. The two-week gap in September in the chart below is the result of the terrorist attacks. This credit-spread measure is an excellent barometer of sentiment. As risk-seeking behavior diminishes, the spreads widen as investors demand greater expected return on their capital. A narrowing of credit spreads accompanies bull markets. The spreads on investment-grade bonds, or those rated BBB or higher, rose significantly compared with their March 2000 levels. However, these spreads have narrowed considerably since the end of September 2001, despite an upturn induced by accounting uncertainties. Bond investors are different from their equity-besotted cousins: While a stock can capitalize hope, all that a bond investor can hope for is to get paid back. The self-deluded need not apply. March 2000 Feb. 2002 % Increase Sept. 2001 Feb. 2002 % Increase AAA 0.99% 1.21% 22.45% 1.83% 1.21% -33.75% AA 1.23 1.37 11.55 1.82 1.37 -24.59 A 1.50 1.74 16.14 2.36 1.74 -26.17 BBB 1.99 2.62 31.77 2.96 2.62 -11.39 BB 3.25 4.77 46.85 5.26 4.77 -9.26 BB- 3.21 4.40 37.15 5.47 4.40 -19.51 B 6.18 5.73 -7.25 7.80 5.73 -26.51 The spread on the lowest grade bonds, single-B, narrowed between March 2000 and February 2002, but this category is buffeted by large movements for a small number of illiquid securities. Index Spreads and Risk A second measure of risk-seeking behavior can be found in the spread between the Nasdaq and the S&P 500. If we compare the spread between 10-year BB- corporates and Treasuries against this stock index ratio, the inverted and lagging relationship is quite visible. The explosive October 1998 to March 2000 rally in the Nasdaq occurred alongside a significant drop in credit spreads at the BB- level. Both markets were willing to fund risky ventures. Once the party ended, this credit spread started to expand and continued to rise into the April 2001 spike bottom in stocks. The BB- spread plunged in October-November 2001, the time of a sharp Nasdaq rally, and then into the start of the year. Barring another catastrophe on the order of Enron or another external shock, this spread should narrow as the economy strengthens. Even though technology and telecommunications are still mired in a slump, the conditions for investing in riskier equities appear to be in place. We're past the blood-in-the-streets point now, but investors in higher-yielding bonds, convertibles and small growth stocks should be rewarded. Bank on It Much has been made of bank credit being tight for lower-quality borrowers. This is to be expected. Bank lending is a lagging indicator of the economy. Well after business peaks, inventories are being financed, and backward-looking financial statements remain strong. And well after the economy rebounds, banks that have been burned by late payments and defaults are reluctant to extend credit. Bankers, unlike investors, don't get rewarded for being the first one to buy. The lagging relationship can be seen quite clearly in a comparison of commercial and industrial lending to the S&P 500. Bank lending won't pick up for months, but when it does, the extension of credit on top of the Fed's loose credit will expand the money supply and trigger what could be an explosive rally by the end of the year. Earnings? Hey, we've earned this one. thestreet.com

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (17817)	3/6/2002 1:05:18 PM
From: Libbyt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23786

are bothered by the fact that we don't have a well defined end to the war. IMO the reason some people feel that way has to do with the nature of this war. It isn't a war that is easily defined, and it is a war being fought on many different fronts. Since we're fighting terrorists, some of the "targets" aren't clearly defined...and most likely some of the victories we've achieved can't be publicized. I would think that quite a few "fronts" of this war involved operations that can't be made public.