Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (1520)	3/6/2002 3:42:59 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I agreed with everything you wrote until you got to this. Inferring that gays make up the nucleus of pedophiles despite data to the contrary and despite the intuitively obvious numerical impossibility of it is not thoughtful. Making an inference that anyone who tries to correct that ignorance is a flag carrier for the gay agenda is not thoughtful. I have seen studies that show that gays and bisexuals make up the majority of molesters of boys. You can rightly claim that most pedophiles target girls, but this was a discussion of priests molesting boys.

To: Lane3 who wrote (1520)	3/6/2002 3:46:11 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"Insisting that one's kids are at risk from the gay couple down the block but not from Uncle Harry is also outside the boundary. IMO, of course." And continual, repeated insisting that anyone was insisting on this when absolutely no one did is what? Especially when if that was a misunderstanding on your part it has been loudly and repeatedly discounted. Yet this complaint of yours continues. Why? This was not the position of one single poster on this thread, but I have seen it in many posts of yours on this topic as well as the posts of an aligned group of posters. Why? Have you stopped beating your husband yet?