Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2002 Canadian Stock-Picking Challenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (469)	3/6/2002 4:24:55 PM
From: Davy Crockett	Respond to of 1590

<LOL> wish I could do that... Regards, Peter

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (469)	3/6/2002 4:53:19 PM
From: Al Collard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1590

The 2002 Stock-Picking Challenge Picks: Mid Week Update March 6th ENTRY CASH ENTRANT STOCK #SHARES PRICE VALUE 1st.mate SWG-t 7,518 @$ 2.66 $21,952.56 Al Collard GAC-t 2,710 @$ 7.38 $15,582.50 August West SVN-t 5,128 @$ 3.90 $11,281.60 Canuck Dave FGX-v 3,200 @$ 8.15 $40,960.00 1st CarterB IZP-t 10,276 @$ 1.50 $16,955.40 Ceedee HYG-t 1,702 @$11.75 $19,521.94 couldawoulda GBU-t 6,844 @$ 3.65 $24,159.32 Cush KCA-t 5,405 @$ 3.70 $20,214.70 Dag GAC-t 2,197 @$ 6.12 $12,632.75 Daytek77 ACA-t 5,277 @$ 3.79 $14,564.52 Duff Gain AC-t 3,453 @$ 5.25 $18,991.50 Eva BAY-t 6,779 @$ 2.95 $23,048.60 fallen_cowboy NT-t 1,680 @$11.90 $15,708.00 Frankly Speaking BAY-t 6,779 @$ 2.95 $23,048.60 geoffb_si ONC-t 5,124 @$ 3.55 $15,628.20 Gofer OSI-t 15,443 @$ 1.52 $23,936.65 hx4 cash @$ $11,680.00 Jim Vernon IMI-t 4,878 @$ 4.10 $21,951.00 jonpeetee TLC-t 5,187 @$ 3.57 $27,231.75 JR. OLT-t 12,903 @$ 1.55 $20,773.83 KC Jones AGP-t 11,129 @$ 1.46 $16,470.92 kirby49 sh-CLS-t 312 @$64.00 $20,520.24 marcos SWG-t 11,955 @$ 2.46 $34,908.60 2nd michel petit cash @$ $20,000.00 Miner DMX-t 4,228 @$ 4.73 $22,873.48 MrsNose cash @$ $10,743.00 Rocket Red CTI-t 7,662 @$ 2.61 $18,848.52 roger vandel cash @$ $14,623.00 russett ONC-t 5,337 @$ 2.85 $16,277.85 Shack VAS-t 2,721 @$ 7.35 $19,591.20 Stang CDV-t 6,451 @$ 3.10 $22,578.50 Stephen O FM-t 6,666 @$ 3.00 $19,331.40 Sultan DMC-t 2,085 @$ 9.59 $27,417.75 5th svenlar K-t 16,806 @$ 1.19 $28,738.26 3rd Technopeasant GAC-t 1,875 @$ 6.75 $10,781.25 teevee PEY-t 5,037 @$ 3.97 $27,703.50 4th TexasDude AXP-t 888 @$22.50 $16,650.00 The Osprey WIN-t 3,993 @$ 3.19 $12,577.95 tyke NGX-t 15,332 @$ 1.37 $21,464.80 vds4 WRX-t 2,263 @$ 7.07 $14,596.35

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (469)	3/24/2002 9:57:06 AM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1590

Dave i assume Canada is infuriated by this-- U.S. Puts Tariff on Canadian Lumber Amid Allegations of Unfair Subsidies Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government levied tariffs Friday averaging 29% on a popular type of Canadian lumber in an effort to protect American jobs and retaliate for what it says are unfair trade practices. Critics say the move could add $1,500 to the price of a new U.S. home and devastate the Canadian lumber industry, which already has suffered mill closings and job losses from U.S. tariffs imposed last year. The Commerce Department determined in its investigation that Canada subsidizes its industry by charging low fees to log public lands and allows its producers to sell their lumber in the U.S. at below-market prices, an illegal practice known as dumping. "While the final duty rates do not fully offset the amount of injury to the U.S. lumber industry, this decision substantiates the U.S. lumber industry's claim that the Canadian government subsidizes Canadian lumber mills," said Rusty Wood, U.S. Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports chairman. The ruling involves softwood lumber, commonly used in home construction. The U.S. imported $5.7 billion worth from Canada in 2001, about a third of the U.S. supply. The Commerce Department set a 19.3% duty to punish Canada for the subsidies and a second tariff averaging 9.7% for dumping. The dumping duty varies by company. Lumber from Canada's Maritime provinces was excluded from both duties. Canadian International Trade Minister Pierre Pettigrew called the duties "obscene." "I am sorry that the American administration did not find the nerve to confront its protectionist softwood lumber producers," he said. The duties can't be imposed until the U.S. International Trade Commission determines if American lumber interests have been harmed by the Canadians. But the commission already has issued a preliminary ruling against the Canadians. The final ruling is expected in May. It was the in a month that the Bush administration has sought to impose tariffs to help a struggling U.S. industry. Earlier it imposed tariffs on steel imports. The trade commission and Commerce Department have been investigating Canadian softwood trade for about a year. The department last year imposed two temporary duties averaging about 32%. One of the duties expired in December. The lumber dispute is decades old. Canada and the U.S. have reached temporary truces in the past. The most recent agreement expired a year ago and both sides have since been litigating their cases while they talked. Negotiators worked long hours this week to try to reach agreement before the Commerce Department took action, but talks broke down late Thursday. "American demands were quite unreasonable," Mr. Pettigrew said. U.S. producers say they're losing revenue and jobs because of Canada's trade practices. The Canadians argue their lumber is cheaper for a variety of reasons, including production efficiency. They say it can't be replaced by a prominent U.S. product, Southern yellow pine, because that wood warps too easily. During negotiations, the U.S. asked Canada to adopt an export tax and gradually change how lumber producers buy wood from forests managed by Canada's 10 provinces. Neither side could agree on a fair tax or how those reforms would be implemented. U.S. home builders supported the Canadians because they say a tariff will increase the cost of new homes, while environmentalists sided with the U.S. industry, hoping a trade agreement would lead to less logging. Thousands of Canadians have lost their jobs since the temporary duties were imposed. Canada challenged those tariffs at the World Trade Organization, which set up a panel in December to hear the case, and has said it will do the same before North American Free Trade Agreement panels. Copyright © 2002 Associated Press Updated March 22, 2002 5:54 p.m. EST