Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Handshake™ who wrote (2553)	3/6/2002 7:21:37 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

Quinn and his lawsuits against TK et al So far this Quinn guy has started a lot of lawsuits but he hasn't won any. I don't really know if he can win these lawsuits. I think the truly guilty parties in these transactions are the public companies themselves who agree to the toxic funding. If they didn't know what would happen to the share price, then they were negligent. If they did know what would happen (as I believe), then they are responsible. I also don't know if they can prove who manipulated and shorted what as most of the transactions were done offshore where they do not recognize US securities regulations. Since then they have even changed holding companies and countries so maybe the offshore entity has no records even. If Quinn were to ever win, I'm sure all the holding companies will just fold. They made one LLC for each transaction so why not. More TK research here mary.cc Also note, I don't think anyone has won one of these toxic funding cases yet but a lot of companies have settled, in favor of the lender; case in point, MBPT. They settled with TK, publicly admitted guilt and stated that TK did no wrong, then they turned over the rest of the shares. It will be interesting to see how these cases turn out.

To: Handshake™ who wrote (2553)	3/6/2002 10:06:32 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Re: 3/6/02 - [MDMN] Medinah Minerals, Inc. Legal Update Medinah Minerals, Inc. Legal Update The lawsuits filed in the United States District Court of Nevada against numerous individuals, accusing them of actions that constitute intentional or negligent interference with prospective economic advantages to be realized by the plaintiffs Medinah in their business operations, and seeking injunctive relief and damages, are proceeding toward depositions and trial dates. Default judgments have been obtained against several defendants and will be executed in due course. As an augment to the Nevada cases, Medinah Minerals, Inc. has contracted with the firm of IT/IS, Inc. of Houston, Texas to provide litigation support service. IT/IS develops, controls and processes documentation for the suspected stock manipulation cases on behalf of Medinah Minerals and its shareholders. Upon completion of the IT/IS reports, they will be submitted to the Houston law firm of John M. O’Quinn and Associates, who will decide the next course of action. All major fees involved are on a contingency basis with the legal representatives. On June 26, 2000, by consent of all parties, the scheduled trial of Medinah Minerals, Inc. vs. Dayton Mining Corp. was adjourned pending a settlement offer from Dayton. As the settlement terms were not fulfilled by Dayton, Medinah has instructed its Counsel to proceed to trial. Medinah Minerals, Inc. March 6, 2002 medinahminerals.com

To: Handshake™ who wrote (2553)	3/7/2002 12:50:29 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Medinah's statement said: "Upon completion of the IT/IS reports, they will be submitted to the Houston law firm of John M. O’Quinn and Associates, who will decide the next course of action." So they're going to mail something to O'Quinn, who may or may not take the case. If there's not a deep pocket to go after, I doubt he'll take it. Considering MDMN's history of unfulfilled promises, the most recent of which was a 1/31 claim that $5 mill would be in hand by February 22, your celebration is premature and unjustifed. ... Mezz - What's the share count?