To: JGoren who wrote (20023 ) 3/7/2002 10:26:43 AM From: Ramsey Su Respond to of 197253 John, that was interesting news. Based on what I can find, this is the reason. It appears that up to now, unlike the Sprints and the VZs, Unicom does not buy any handsets from manufacturers but rather just let them sell direct to subscribers. So this may be the first time that Unicom will buy handsets and act as reseller. I will use this opportunity to express my opinion on what the hell is happening over there. Bottom line: NOT ENOUGH HANDSETS. There are a few reasons. 1) the handset manufacturers did not anticipate the completion speed of the network. This is of course very short sighted because all the infra vendors are seasoned vets of IS95 networks. So while Unicom was shooting for Jan, the handset manufacturers were shooting for March. 2) the UIM card must had been a problem at some time. It is inconceivable that the Chinese manufacturers with foreign backing cannot make a simple IS95 handset with proven MSM3100 chipsets. 3) many of the manufacturers are choosing the cautious approach, unwilling to put all the chips in that one basket. With 1X decision in the immediate future, there is no hurry to be the first to market with potentially an immediately obsolete product line. 4) a few of the manufacturers should never have been approved. They lack the know-how and the capital to get into the highly competitive handset game. 5) the A shares approval news is very significant. This is a committment that is not easily reversible. Don't forget Unicom has no GSM 3G WCDMA migration path at this time. This could be the catalyst that get the handset manufacturers motivated. Ironically, the single foreign manufacturer, MOT, could be a huge benefactor. In conclusion, I do not buy any of the BS about CDMA demand being below expectations, bad quality or no sub rumours. You may want to ask how long it will take Unicom to get going? My opinion is a month or two. <ggg> private joke here. Ramsey