Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (1680)	3/7/2002 10:25:33 AM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Unless there's more to it, that study wasn't of rape as it is usually understood. It's not uninteresting to find out how many women who got naked in bed with men they'd had sex with before, and would again, ended up getting f'd when they didn't want to be, but it's rather a different study than of cases of terrifying and life-changing classic rape. It also appears injuriously to trivialize the experience of those hard core rape victims to include in their category women whose boyfriends got aggressive when, naked and drunk, the woman got ambivalent or changed her mind yet didn't consider herself raped, and continued to have sex with the 'rapist.' If fear wasn't present, it is a different category of experience. And games of resistance take place so misunderstandings are in some cases possible, especially if a struggle is with a customary sexual partner, is half-hearted, and is and unaccompanied by, for example, screams for help. although it is unclear if it were mere aggressiveness or a real physical threat If it was, not if it were!... It's imperfect, not subjunctive. <g>