Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.T. who wrote (11081)	3/7/2002 2:11:18 PM
From: J.T.	Respond to of 19219

For the MITA archives so I do not have to repeat my thoughts going forward from CNBC Critique thread: To:J.T. who wrote (9976) From: Gamma Positive Thursday, Mar 7, 2002 1:52 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9978 JT, This is obviously deteriorating from any discussion of the facts, so I will stop after this post and you can denigrate me as much as you like without further retribution. My posts stand for themselves. I have written nothing but my opinion (the majority on the "CNBC critique" thread) and no where do I use derogatory terms that is so prevalent on message boards. (In addition, you have to take my posts on the "CNBC critique" thread in context--what may seem like a criticism may be in actuality a defense of someone elses comment.) I try to state the truth about what I see. A bull market or a bear market where there is one. A good reporter or a bad one. Good shows or bad ones. I don't pretend to be a guru, nor do I want to be one, and have others pat me on the back. Or deny that if I've made a bad call that I had read it right all along. BTW, where have I ever said anything about Richard Hoey. I sure don't remember that one. Regards and good luck with your thread. ********************** To:Gamma Positive who wrote (9977) From: J.T. Thursday, Mar 7, 2002 2:05 PM Respond to of 9978 This guy you don't mention by name I believe is Richard Hoey: To:capitalistbeatnik who started this subject From: Gamma Positive Wednesday, Mar 6, 2002 9:24 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9977 Who is this guest host this morning? Earlier he said he "wasn't wrong" on TYC even though he recommended it in the mid 40's and it's now 32. And just a moment ago, he said "if you take away this latest panic, it's done extremely well". LOL! Is this guy a "professional money manager"? Classic denial. ***************** My point to you is this:** I was the first one on SI who posted SPX 1,080 that would be tested time and again before it happened. SPX 1,080 WAS THE BOTTOM. I posted BKX 774 intraday lows needed to hold or everything would break SPX and BKX.. etc the intraday lows was BKX 775 twice. It held and reversed. Now I call SPX 1,162 resistance BEFORE it happened, I get out and you have the audacity to question me again with cynical intent. What was yesterday close? SPX 1,162. Now we are at SPX 1,152. I said reentry at SPX 1,138 to 1,142 test. I have said one of my shortcomings is sometimes I am early. Now you see how I make up for my mistakes. I am read down at the CBOE they know my levels. And it is people like you who ruin it for the many and why this information will soon be no longer free. You choose to illuminate my faults that is your choice. But it is only half the true picture you paint. Have a wonderful, productive and fruitful life. God Bless you. Best Regards, J.T.