Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (95792)	3/7/2002 2:38:12 PM
From: Night Writer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Don Young was at PW several years ago. My then PW broker said Don was a hot shot analyst looking for fame. It appears he is still looking for fame.

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (95792)	3/7/2002 3:05:09 PM
From: Night Writer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

I begining to hope Wally gets hit by a truck. HP Suppresses Unfavorable Customer Survey Results PALO ALTO, Calif., March 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Walter B. Hewlett, on behalf of The William R. Hewlett Revocable Trust and its trustees, today issued the following statement about Hewlett-Packard's (NYSE: HWP) suppression of customer survey results, as reported in The Wall Street Journal: As reported in the March 7, 2002 "Digits" column in The Wall Street Journal, it appears that HP, in the weeks leading up to ISS' report on the merger, attempted to suppress the findings of a customer survey that HP commissioned in February 2002 from Ziff Davis Media Inc.'s Market Experts. This survey shows that customers would be spending less with the combined HP/Compaq after the merger. The results of the Ziff Davis survey stand in stark contrast to those of a much smaller Technology Business Research Inc. customer survey HP presented to ISS. The results of the Ziff Davis survey show that(1): At announcement of the proposed merger: -- 41% of customers started with a negative view of the proposed merger -- 29% of customers started with a positive view of the proposed merger -- 48% of those who say HP is a critical vendor were negative -- 62% who say Compaq is a critical vendor were negative Since the announcement: -- 25% of customers are more negative about the merger -- 17% of customers are more positive about the merger -- 30% of customers who say HP is a critical vendor are more negative about the merger -- 13% of customers who say HP is a critical vendor are more positive about the merger -- 27% of customers who say Compaq is a critical vendor are more negative about the merger -- 17% of customers who say Compaq is a critical vendor are more positive about the merger A negative reaction of this magnitude from both HP and Compaq customers, we believe, does not bode well for integration and emphasizes the potential for revenue losses of 10% or more. It specifically calls into question HP's low revenue loss assumptions. The suppression of this survey appears to be part of a pattern that HP has been pursuing in order to hide the truth and convince shareholders that the proposed merger will not destroy significant shareholder value. In addition to suppressing the results of the Ziff Davis survey, in the last three months HP has: -- Continued to publicly claim widespread employee support for the proposed merger based on its own internal employee surveys, while three employee surveys conducted by the nationally recognized independent Field Research Corporation, commissioned by David Packard, have shown that employees are against the merger at a rate of over 2-to-1.(2) In addition, HP has refused to disclose either the name of the firm doing the polls or the methodology used in the internal surveys; -- Refused to reveal information on CEO compensation packages that were being contemplated totaling $115 million, while publicly touting the $8 million and $14.4 million retention bonuses that HP chairman and CEO Carly Fiorina and Compaq CEO Michael Capellas voluntarily declined. Note: ISS censured HP's management for its lack of disclosure on CEO compensation issues.(3) -- Tried to distance Carly Fiorina from the failure of the joint venture she led between Lucent and Philips Electronics NV in 1997, even though she remained Consumer Products Business President at Lucent until after the joint venture was called off at significant loss to both companies -- which she has called the "biggest mistake" of her career.(4,5) We believe that HP stockholders deserve to know the truth and that HP's "win at all costs" strategy destroys the same credibility that HP needs to get the merger done in the face of strong opposition from investors, employees and customers. We urge all HP stockholders to vote "AGAINST" the proposed merger by signing, dating and mailing the GREEN proxy card today. (1) Ziff Davis Market Experts survey "The HP/Compaq Merger: Customers in the Balance," February 2002 (2) The surveys were commissioned and paid for by David W. Packard, acting as an individual. Mr. Packard is not a participant in the solicitation of proxies from Hewlett-Packard stockholders being conducted by Walter B. Hewlett, Edwin E. van Bronkhorst and The William R. Hewlett Revocable Trust. (3) ISS Proxy Analysis, Hewlett Packard, p.18-19, March 5, 2002 (4) Carly Fiorina Q&A Session, HP Analyst Meeting, February 27, 2002. (5) "H-P Names Carly Fiorina a Lucent Star to be CEO," The Wall Street Journal, 7/20/99 MacKenzie Partners, Inc. 105 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10016 proxy@mackenziepartners.com (800) 322-2885 (toll-free) (212) 929-5500 (call collect) or visit www.VoteNoHpCompaq.com